Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp857501ybp; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 06:08:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJOUFfCivaDZdI87/s2M2OyCgPzJPIHtcMae46RyGTz7JcLj0+q86ZdVX4ZUjw8TzeF6pf X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c749:: with SMTP id c9mr15161679eds.232.1570194504660; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 06:08:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570194504; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CRhX+hg98JexA4SvTsgtHxtgWVSsOnE75x/Af2ErmO9AuBWxDQoWxZbhx9eADJPOZh tWmk3ay4L1FjPKEt8JOnKhXmQEPYGhMstF22uNYRKaVoSMynVqUAPqc+TvK7fSeJzaPh Fu/knl6I4mrMTy8ejE1ytpTQljCA2ZvN1to7rfQ1Hy3yxk+37McqUSaNE1Is9mraaOTv gOUAgWtjy5zOkMxHncAU0dukqGZp7LFnWNmS43sxxpLPoN1Rf7um0hZtTUqiQOzMMZc8 xH3iwJKSt1Ct3Za5NrMEUwVH92exd7AOsbLRskFkWCQQqRX6d4Yf5jKhPVH3F+xoJF+W OjTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=owB+0qIMoiD4khHlOx6XdkpZsBAmXun1zaiAh9/ru18=; b=d+sTCC2x2BSXmLE8AmKYonGPl+/X/m9YjUGmB9Nju4kJFhSiXm1ygpRmrQqDRyqkoo yVGFahq7thmmE/SbyOcYcruKXRAhXR8FIjIPEhnQYdtyMurOIAbH2VydpY3nElfE7QHk mfWgkS7vGgPeMm1Ty+VIvi1awyZ5M81tzPigYeep7j+EenvgpwmV79rq0Ij0xc14WA81 QzK/ZoZ/WSxuDHfZo5tKdPzJFxXuQzg8wbvrj3DZyeJB6/aGxzJG2Nu1rOW1aLtpLTW7 xLlI7K7QTus5VmK82CEo+ENCQ/iqsfYs1ZX1NmfyMsRFrNurJj4hX17XRxC8psHP/4AO 0BoQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ODuxhFr4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w13si3366162edx.361.2019.10.04.06.07.59; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 06:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ODuxhFr4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388037AbfJDNFY (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:05:24 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com ([209.85.166.65]:33402 "EHLO mail-io1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728999AbfJDNFY (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:05:24 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id z19so13434340ior.0 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 06:05:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=owB+0qIMoiD4khHlOx6XdkpZsBAmXun1zaiAh9/ru18=; b=ODuxhFr4Dd5XuPsWn8IgPf1Swa5PlcyIBmSDPW1rS8uMDmK/6S6dNDgHYKOKImNbFX 61kuxlnGal/bij6RzNCjSbQFbV7/QKNvSqqeLrElxOT7W+JRcZVBfNiUJhVm4qVX1XQM BqU2ZwbWxD49TWAP4j/HpGiH7Ks63Gt+3VhDcv3kvOST28oYKVSHzYy8aYSviabTRuLo e7sAG++Cq+6kKv7+yzxac2hrYLZ/Lq2XCtM7rrO0wdZNLHsCD06cguZIijSs3D5OARk8 7gH0j5AZi+fPyGfNifdjh4jFu9G325QH8+6J7smw/7vblWcTVsAIMTdURw/Ju/wU9pKv uy0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=owB+0qIMoiD4khHlOx6XdkpZsBAmXun1zaiAh9/ru18=; b=bJ033QZ1o+SNcpnnNT/OvHn5VZmWe+e/pe1w41lDlQoabiYf4043HydDfGkgLMWL03 oCmP2kns7GhwGjxjdiGw/8wibbctaIp/Px0iYm0tzSybqqSD4H+bek0dXhNRZVjmnmAH fqILR1XxuktsDLGAJ4jGa3N7+X1vQAdf8XDzfoXgAa6W9VkDAaKyRFRFU2ezks9gzh1k Mo3xwyswCPxCxj/5ozWyY+IzzSyeuThTYc5VeBciGYIEjL64pt1kDFBongc+pvsdhA1I kKb/pJtxBUzSMl1+LzzGgt0xiciMYGOQJdXK6Isqdwo1T+mFZeZGxNMQUZ5u6t8FtIN/ sNwg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXxB56dxc4mlaboXjGVWmtwdFFEkIwgF+6rd0kLEf41DkQTaJGl 5ScaA5KGvEg8uqKXXBm/Q8o4jQ== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7102:: with SMTP id q2mr12090006iog.154.1570194323097; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 06:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w68sm3266361ili.59.2019.10.04.06.05.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Oct 2019 06:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: Fix reversed nonblock flag To: "Pavel Begunkov (Silence)" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild test robot References: <75be62996d115a3e2effa6753a6d803069131460.1570177340.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <7a18d7d7-323a-5903-2952-814954910ddd@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 07:05:21 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/4/19 4:07 AM, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote: > From: Pavel Begunkov > > io_queue_link_head() accepts @force_nonblock flag, but io_ring_submit() > passes something opposite. > > v2: fix build error by test robot: Rebase from custom tree > Reported-by: kbuild test robot > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov > --- > fs/io_uring.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c > index c934f91c51e9..c909ea2b84e9 100644 > --- a/fs/io_uring.c > +++ b/fs/io_uring.c > @@ -2703,6 +2703,7 @@ static int io_ring_submit(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int to_submit, > struct io_kiocb *shadow_req = NULL; > bool prev_was_link = false; > int i, submit = 0; > + bool force_nonblock = true; > > if (to_submit > IO_PLUG_THRESHOLD) { > io_submit_state_start(&state, ctx, to_submit); > @@ -2710,9 +2711,9 @@ static int io_ring_submit(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int to_submit, > } > > for (i = 0; i < to_submit; i++) { > - bool force_nonblock = true; > struct sqe_submit s; > > + force_nonblock = true; > if (!io_get_sqring(ctx, &s)) > break; > > @@ -2761,7 +2762,7 @@ static int io_ring_submit(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int to_submit, > > if (link) > io_queue_link_head(ctx, link, &link->submit, shadow_req, > - block_for_last); > + force_nonblock); > if (statep) > io_submit_state_end(statep); Shouldn't this just be: io_queue_link_head(ctx, link, &link->submit, shadow_req, !block_for_last); We're outside the loop, so by definition at the end of what we need to do. We don't need to factor in the fiddling of force_nonblock here, it'll be false at this point anyway. Only exception is error handling, if the caller asked for more than what was in the ring. Not a big deal... -- Jens Axboe