Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <ec1e06404931e78f91d84f0cd8df9341c9cd74d6.camel@kellner.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add initial support for USB4
From:   Christian Kellner <christian@kellner.me>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, yehezkelshb@gmail.com,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, andreas.noever@gmail.com,
        michael.jamet@intel.com, rajmohan.mani@intel.com,
        nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au, lukas@wunner.de,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
        anthony.wong@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:22:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20191004151621.GL2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <bb84da73d1df468da1707a2af09eb2de@AUSX13MPC105.AMER.DELL.COM>
         <20191003080028.GK2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>
         <06a04bff94494da99c5359a7fb645d19@AUSX13MPC105.AMER.DELL.COM>
         <20191004075426.GA2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>
         <CA+CmpXsMkwZhCegGYPYQo2GwN6ROwDYbY3RVZTEeN+FfZ-PbMQ@mail.gmail.com>
         <20191004081951.GD2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>
         <CA+CmpXvoro+m-NZLguMtDq_r_Og8LAFQgPGosvA+WsjMhi6m1Q@mail.gmail.com>
         <332849ed8714496587251b6319a11b0b@AUSX13MPC105.AMER.DELL.COM>
         <20191004142110.GJ2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> <1570201357.2.0@kellner.me>
         <20191004151621.GL2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 (3.32.4-1.fc30) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 18:16 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Is there any harm of also having the 'generation' exposed
> > as well? I like the simplicity of the mapping from that value to
> > Thunderbolt/USB4 standard version (e.g. I would show that in
> > 'boltctl
> > list'); 'hw_version' will need a bit more "interpreting".
> 
> If generation is the only thing you need, we can export that now and
> forget hw_version :)
Sounds good to me, that is should indeed be good enough for bolt.