Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 5 Oct 2019 06:33:11 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
        jglisse@redhat.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, riel@surriel.com,
        khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/rmap.c: reuse mergeable anon_vma as parent when fork
Message-ID: <20191004223311.GA32588@richard>
Reply-To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
References: <20191004160632.30251-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
 <20191004161120.GI32665@bombadil.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191004161120.GI32665@bombadil.infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:11:20AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 12:06:32AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> After this change, kernel build test reduces 20% anon_vma allocation.
>
>But does it have any effect on elapsed time or peak memory consumption?

I didn't evaluate these aspects.

BTW, how to evaluate peak memory consumption? This looks a transient value.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me