Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp2086372ybp; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 05:27:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzY0piXEVmtMcRFeMh7qxl4ByWCNwjsce6JRy94pc3sE4yPtZtODQhIrL1es7rxiHBR5DOr X-Received: by 2002:a50:8933:: with SMTP id e48mr20047256ede.51.1570278438581; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 05:27:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570278438; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cqhv4Jhzn3Nq/7LX7IObczLq2tg1Evsven5NjkYHKa88yQngy0YDaRlMN5Q9SazWNl gIYwV4X+nI7dQxEgJl6ifzNDP3xDyiV6CESw7JHCt+BwlMMZn5Ejc/Mv04JU5djxGYhJ elkeQi3477+08WCk4hXnDZh3wvAXfo+cOI692uDxELa2O6vx4fgcoCgqUtRy1D7Qv6rs BsJ2Vh+65YHeplCeaxfvO+b6hjDkjJDmmP81dIS+mHYJmKyq7UPYfdRhIaitpwnTb/nv sdMZUJz/JJuB3/pOUx2eW3qeOLuxfUcmjKSLwmC1GHdAKOAoaosomFkZfZItgbPl0UiF lxGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=2gT0qUrakml298cDNhrwEpXSiSCZzAHNpV7zqvNnNoY=; b=X2n3D8MiH81tKf8008a1NvECueA5OyAP5nDZuDraOL4BT6k6nEi2hGMlFr1GcsShRy U/ZuUhC9oBvkfhQRH4r8EWEDFGTe/8x1vGO3xcikQ+um0Ebusbua5g9VLO/CYg3wjcD+ wf9JMIi+LEUyQgGuCvvrDD1ORzyph0tjxe1YZSlfD4IFSxV15ssTOd2kk+AXIjV5xZbf i/Zis8mzyTfG3m3hdDJak/2TWwfGVK+JEQrMfM396RTCsFI/3hsYF2bGvz8GyebbukL8 UQ1aKria/EwHmwiAQduEQpWcojU95OhTEj8ZKbmzExJ7Ao/fgJBLyeTOxLgytKP4L0sz kPUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qu18si4400062ejb.80.2019.10.05.05.26.54; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 05:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728218AbfJEM0L (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 5 Oct 2019 08:26:11 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:35359 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726198AbfJEM0L (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Oct 2019 08:26:11 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,260,1566856800"; d="scan'208";a="404856155" Received: from 81-65-53-202.rev.numericable.fr (HELO hadrien) ([81.65.53.202]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Oct 2019 14:26:09 +0200 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 14:26:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring cc: Masahiro Yamada , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Gilles Muller , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jessica Yu , Julia Lawall , Martijn Coenen , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Matthias_M=E4nnich?= , Michal Marek , Nicolas Palix , Yue Haibing , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Cocci] [RFC] scripts: Fix coccicheck failed In-Reply-To: <21684307-d05c-1856-c849-95436aedeb86@web.de> Message-ID: References: <21684307-d05c-1856-c849-95436aedeb86@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1481532127-1570278369=:2653" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1481532127-1570278369=:2653 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 5 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > > You gave Acked-by to the one-liner fix "virtual report", > > It was (temporarily?) accepted to use the script “add_namespace.cocci” > without such a type of SmPL variable. > > > > and I am happy to apply it to my tree. > > Would you like to take the change possibility into account > that the coccicheck system configuration should be adapted instead? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=4ea655343ce4180fe9b2c7ec8cb8ef9884a47901#n257 I prefer the one line change for now. If more issues arise one can see what is more desirable at a larger scale. julia > > Regards, > Markus > --8323329-1481532127-1570278369=:2653--