Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp2230560ybp; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 08:06:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyq9O8ltDcvBgV5JugGpPoo2pq+0jT2/sRGqoEuhuqtIxywJrrif86FHi83fcd4EbPU4Yvz X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1259:: with SMTP id l25mr20944647edw.174.1570287998153; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:06:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570287998; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RdV4KJipIwHYkFdKnawUOtWO35XtfBlntfVzFgltN5ph19Ych5w/y8Ui76LBZ1FOg9 zexlbVTXNwFEyiRuUNkkpQ2kobwAsHhbyRC1CsqWXLY/Jyj/ClNxHq3oVRRw8HvoGX50 qDaq8GF5lgnh0LhZnyjUDgvhOztc50jBZcLbfdJg8bRa5Dv+HWOXBozY58OSHUGtl6W5 vWk51oaq7Ruw26mXgC6PcdWumfm9ntzkY4SY3VPIMD0+EYjX0knfsF4nnIqnALCKZli+ eCh7UwnvFG9ovZqJZPAgW+IVjXUJTPcAxa0NMV+UcCJOlcRWoJNhC4p1sfDpn7VT0TWF nWiA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=gw016/XWIUt0fMd7M1Dcv9gEgXKBPOQ0lQttG8eRBpU=; b=akIRszadMBHU54i4MnQ1aAgLvBURtTTTUbFCfXWemyvoPb+WhdmfLKAWnqkBOd6RMd o8HH2CuCMhQHu+OBQgAKfu7xjrsHe6SkuJN4AWX/V5xNkTGVpsOm6K8XheEgRZfv27Fw 0GmgUVxhKfAUM03Yy3INh2H9ZmBeNr9PIXR35erCn5boZvQdT1C2AsE8YA5swBLphAGP RANnn/NX7cdrpPl4LZXiNX29OTsdQGaItZNGHqoBXocgB10iZy71JHq6l+W3ojHwjti0 onvHtVLegol+5r1JD3YaILM8KasJX3h8lvTE5dWYqMskDHhL/B+htLVTwm0MF5VXAKCu lKrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gY6kyIbj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id re13si4442269ejb.279.2019.10.05.08.06.14; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gY6kyIbj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728220AbfJEPBY (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 5 Oct 2019 11:01:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:36005 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725963AbfJEPBY (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Oct 2019 11:01:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id y19so10423983wrd.3; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:01:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gw016/XWIUt0fMd7M1Dcv9gEgXKBPOQ0lQttG8eRBpU=; b=gY6kyIbjmKFoGNSKaLauhHYk1XL22ReJLZFFkqZ5y5BRSko/k3H2roAj7WpyzkHQFZ Ahy1PhAQ3n7AwmOXxbidfeMs4yZ4oL9VrlMcLRTjvOtIS874WAr7zy942jyPPC5jjYO6 DV8q+fwXb0EB5C5omHY/Vt5YO45CXUMMjaecmhr0wU6A0M680WvKPyXs1EymHlNml4h6 XysSxUxBmf/fLaXTcMjkuYCVuYmwxJGsfYg0aS7stgXkwcy684s9yo4CLUXfDXiBts5N npXYx9KnNqQKJ/7KA0dqCaq3bkB6IE3R3+SFY1E97On/Yd55CY9Mfdj8bCrJVN5SoVzD iCSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gw016/XWIUt0fMd7M1Dcv9gEgXKBPOQ0lQttG8eRBpU=; b=stzOMQB6QtOjIb7BaVS60ISi/yyntS3GhE1JORwZMRl9SxwgXMK1S29bHMQagnjtl2 MOnwqVjn/cepD3VWbLFh1RV3BEZEUlgQMrp6kKQOucLWPZ9VjhMo9Lil3TdpWRO/GZF8 6I+myu9fcTrrh5iERtWKGglqHwyuu9b9I7gXTffU4W/iq7bZNYRhSOhUZ+dt0wDJagQB jnUUyoMjdbJGw2909jx0aA96m7yOZMzYK6JajBsknzbjjyY7rdhKgsQ6ezWNqkvIHZNV oxSs3h+BEmKD0qYgebnKH1M/M0xvTCB/1BhENTVAJ7w1O5RlUXBSXf9njoMhyN5O2/Qz Y2ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW8zUYm2jLy+sK+o9rAUoM2eXOUv7LaOOYvwyOn9FkOEiL1b2XF Iwk4cDHGay11xJlRKJ4eGO4u7Jwm X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5552:: with SMTP id g18mr15248205wrw.386.1570287681461; Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:01:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.202] (p5487B13B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.135.177.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y186sm16934693wmd.26.2019.10.05.08.01.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 regression fix] Input: soc_button_array - partial revert of support for newer surface devices To: Hans de Goede , Dmitry Torokhov , Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20191005105551.353273-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <222c364a-bc2b-5960-3fe4-7d1ce222e3e2@gmail.com> <96cea5be-d285-8323-1ab2-9c8e87993165@redhat.com> From: Maximilian Luz Message-ID: <65b265d2-f7a8-bcd7-e63f-f8efb7349324@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 17:01:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <96cea5be-d285-8323-1ab2-9c8e87993165@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, again On 10/5/19 3:20 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Ok, on x86 the GPIO drivers really should all be builtin because > various ACPI methods including device D0 / D3 (power-on/off) methods > may depend on them. So normally this should never happen. > > If this (-EPROBE_DEFER on surface devices) somehow still is happening > please let me know and we will figure something out. I have never personally experienced this, only received reports which indicated this and that the change (as well as manually reloading soc_button_array) fixed it. I will come back to you if I hear anything in regards to this again. I have now also tested your patch on the Surface Book 2. Does not cause any issues as far as I can tell. Tested-by: Maximilian Luz And if that is needed/wanted Acked-by: Maximilian Luz Regards, Maximilian