Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965287AbWADVUY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:20:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965288AbWADVUY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:20:24 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]:19760 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965287AbWADVUX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:20:23 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AN2MsyMLw0WhO6zwBUoMbfTzkElgqjkfjuPKL7ETKGZUnzpbKP5PHUarrOMipoQcARIPzTrq8nYXORv2EQu1b/fsLtrC1caVLyUQXq5LpTDLvoYecQ50waYA94wCs5wx/o7GXSPOUsYk3YqmLQYmE0KL+2PEdvVO1SWpeatc59k= Message-ID: <9a8748490601041320u36927efne860ee232194e499@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:20:21 +0100 From: Jesper Juhl To: gcoady@gmail.com Subject: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch Cc: Mark Lord , "Randy.Dunlap" , Nick Warne , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200601041710.37648.nick@linicks.net> <200601041728.52081.nick@linicks.net> <9a8748490601040940peb15b75n454e02a622f795e1@mail.gmail.com> <200601041745.39180.nick@linicks.net> <9a8748490601040950q2b2691f5l7577b52417b4c50b@mail.gmail.com> <9a8748490601040956qa427366n3daea86e531763e8@mail.gmail.com> <43BC0F0A.2060605@rtr.ca> <9a8748490601041013j61eb992eucd5abe9dcaf8d2ce@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1590 Lines: 39 On 1/4/06, Grant Coady wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:13:08 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > >On 1/4/06, Mark Lord wrote: > >> Jesper Juhl wrote: > >> > > >> >>but the incremental patches do appear to be in > >> >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/incr/ > >> .. > >> > > >> > Hmm, yes, you are right. I was not aware of those. When did those > >> > start to apear? > >> > Guess I need to update applying-patches.txt if those are automated... > >> > >> That's how Greg posts them to LKML also -- as incremental patches. > >> > >Yes, I know that's what he posts them on LKML, I just never knew that > >they got archived on kernel.org in incr. form as well. Now I know :-) > > Easy to revert 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.14 then patch to 2.6.15 if you follow > the stable series. Still saves ~30MB downloading source. > Yup, no point in downloading everything all the time. > Because I'm also compiling the -rc? and -mm? I keep 2.6.14 tree and use > hardlink trees, when 2.6.15 came out I patched the 2.6.14 to 2.6.15 > and deleted the development trees -- works for me ;) > Very similar to what I do myself. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/