Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp4020864ybp; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 01:46:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTgAy5ReltxbjH96xQYlEXYkX+BKuNM2UdYl32afgVnnUHnu+Q3S4xKdjj1aQf/pwVLMSV X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2f10:: with SMTP id v16mr22456364eji.247.1570437981055; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 01:46:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570437981; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dPUtWcWXER5HXrBBNBbq4CFL9jcAmWlgCuns8VzI3A8+btYrSnepOpYgAcVjyXrZcr JLsvsqBkx97iX1cYCB8hrk0sACLf012x5YeoSvt/pxwD72kE1nQqd+jHjxEQREcAwPKd hdOAy/nbXrVnaUHfpwoikoH+nUdjcUqeBKXBvc10HaspqLxG34mwZ1VYpmZVwvHW29/a F6kmd0xaVaitfDEQGNeZj/fORLShj6hqg2PSpzy69bqGv5sVzCOZ7lraRIV3x3VmDL6h T3V4u+svCDtIvG4rV4M6b+bPSfZRl0v7Iy+HtVKYOtadSHEn4vdcEAi+9nE+1I7Txa/l F35Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=Hwp06db+1Q7gdf+WE4WGSUmJFO+vgJqBg6S7LL10Yrs=; b=UYK0I4OQ+rp/LawU0Js7V1OWStUTbZKnMOFpOD0vtbSMxbJVkByyaRdas67EBYgDzx LYmo9RnxTspVgaEx4clnEZ3lueS4a1oAbreko3Ig7jmTR5OsocU7lGwgMFdM5YVn7jzm 38wzBRMcGZBkvKdSKewjuIdOs4AORBYdD+/AqBcWf3SvuWFVbpWEILYJe8fDaZGqQNTD BvPEGD0ezbJ5dIfJ3aus2yYaElXQFWEYoeQqeoh9M7CCmBLf2lUHGdUJ+7j/qEulTATo Tc8JS3Bb/wD8KIn9HpkXA+yD8w0hIPYKskFtesNijvMe5TcIeEkgCM9wlPmmzPw0/Aex Pkag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si6787960ejt.155.2019.10.07.01.45.57; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 01:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727432AbfJGIpR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 04:45:17 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:60991 "EHLO relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726969AbfJGIpR (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 04:45:17 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 86.250.200.211 Received: from xps13 (lfbn-1-17395-211.w86-250.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.250.200.211]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E24661C0015; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:45:11 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Mason Yang Cc: richard@nod.at, marek.vasut@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, bbrezillon@kernel.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, vigneshr@ti.com, marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com, juliensu@mxic.com.tw, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Protection function Message-ID: <20191007104511.5aa7b8f2@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1568793387-25199-2-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> References: <1568793387-25199-1-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> <1568793387-25199-2-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mason, Mason Yang wrote on Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:56:25 +0800: > Macronix AC series support using SET/GET_FEATURES to change > Block Protection and Unprotection. > > MTD default _lock/_unlock function replacement by manufacturer > postponed initialization. Why would we do that? Anyway your solution looks overkill, if we ever decide to implement these hooks for raw nand, it is better just to not overwrite them in nand_scan_tail() if they have been filled previously (ie. by the manufacturer code). > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c > index 58511ae..991c636 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c > @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ > #define MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT BIT(0) > #define MACRONIX_NUM_READ_RETRY_MODES 6 > > +#define ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_PROTECTION 0xA0 > +#define MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_LOCK 0x38 > +#define MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_UNLOCK 0x0 > + > struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix { > u8 reserved; > u8 reliability_func; > @@ -57,10 +61,7 @@ static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip) > * the timings unlike what is declared in the parameter page. Unflag > * this feature to avoid unnecessary downturns. > */ > -static void macronix_nand_fix_broken_get_timings(struct nand_chip *chip) > -{ > - unsigned int i; > - static const char * const broken_get_timings[] = { > +static const char * const broken_get_timings[] = { > "MX30LF1G18AC", > "MX30LF1G28AC", > "MX30LF2G18AC", > @@ -75,7 +76,11 @@ static void macronix_nand_fix_broken_get_timings(struct nand_chip *chip) > "MX30UF4G18AC", > "MX30UF4G16AC", > "MX30UF4G28AC", > - }; > +}; > + > +static void macronix_nand_fix_broken_get_timings(struct nand_chip *chip) > +{ > + unsigned int i; > > if (!chip->parameters.supports_set_get_features) > return; > @@ -105,6 +110,71 @@ static int macronix_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip) > return 0; > } > > +static int mxic_nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +{ > + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > + u8 feature[ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN]; > + int ret; > + > + feature[0] = MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_LOCK; > + nand_select_target(chip, 0); > + ret = nand_set_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_PROTECTION, > + feature); > + nand_deselect_target(chip); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s all blocks failed\n", __func__); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int mxic_nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +{ > + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > + u8 feature[ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN]; > + int ret; > + > + feature[0] = MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_UNLOCK; > + nand_select_target(chip, 0); > + ret = nand_set_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_PROTECTION, > + feature); > + nand_deselect_target(chip); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s all blocks failed\n", __func__); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * Macronix AC series support using SET/GET_FEATURES to change > + * Block Protection and Unprotection. > + * > + * MTD call-back function replacement by manufacturer postponed > + * initialization. > + */ > +static void macronix_nand_post_init(struct nand_chip *chip) > +{ > + unsigned int i, blockprotected = 0; > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(broken_get_timings); i++) { > + if (!strcmp(broken_get_timings[i], chip->parameters.model)) { > + blockprotected = 1; > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (blockprotected && chip->parameters.supports_set_get_features) { > + bitmap_set(chip->parameters.set_feature_list, > + ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_PROTECTION, 1); > + bitmap_set(chip->parameters.get_feature_list, > + ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_PROTECTION, 1); > + > + mtd->_lock = mxic_nand_lock; > + mtd->_unlock = mxic_nand_unlock; > + } > +} > + > const struct nand_manufacturer_ops macronix_nand_manuf_ops = { > .init = macronix_nand_init, > + .post_init = macronix_nand_post_init, > }; Thanks, Miquèl