Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965288AbWADWbA (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:31:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965291AbWADWbA (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:31:00 -0500 Received: from c-24-22-115-24.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([24.22.115.24]:41650 "EHLO aria.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965288AbWADWa6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:30:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:30:45 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Nick Warne Cc: Alistair John Strachan , "Randy.Dunlap" , Jesper Juhl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch Message-ID: <20060104223045.GA13799@kroah.com> References: <200601041710.37648.nick@linicks.net> <200601042210.47152.nick@linicks.net> <20060104221549.GA13254@kroah.com> <200601042220.59637.nick@linicks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601042220.59637.nick@linicks.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1390 Lines: 34 On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0000, Nick Warne wrote: > On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:15, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Then when 2.6.15 came out, that was it! No patch for the 'latest stable > > > kernel release 2.6.14.5'. It was GONE! > > > > That's because 2.6.15 is the latest stable release. > > > > > OK, I suppose we are all capable of getting back to where we are on > > > rebuilding to latest 'stable', but there _is_ a missing link for somebody > > > that doesn't know - and I think backtracking patches isn't really the way > > > to go if the 'latest stable release' isn't catered for. > > > > Um, it is, see my sentance above. And if you want to download older > > stable releases, you can jump to the proper directory, how long do you > > want us to put older stable releases on the main page for? :) > > OK, I see what you mean, but 2.6.14 wasn't the latest 'release' - 2.6.14.5 was > (according to kernel.org). Yet there is no upgrade path for that build (or > any other .x releases) > > It is a bit of a mess really. Huh? I'm confused, what exactly would you like the kernel.org site to look like? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/