Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965299AbWADWgZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:36:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965300AbWADWgZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:36:25 -0500 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:34203 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965297AbWADWgX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:36:23 -0500 From: Nick Warne To: Jesper Juhl Subject: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:36:10 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: Greg KH , Alistair John Strachan , "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org References: <200601041710.37648.nick@linicks.net> <200601042220.59637.nick@linicks.net> <9a8748490601041430g67720b14h10474d9be5059d9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9a8748490601041430g67720b14h10474d9be5059d9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601042236.10293.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 766 Lines: 23 On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:30, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > (according to kernel.org). Yet there is no upgrade path for that build > > (or any other .x releases) > > > > It is a bit of a mess really. > > but, a 2.6.14.6 kernel might come out *after* 2.6.15, then what? Nightmares... I get all the points. Let me say then it needs better distinction on what the 'latest kernel' is and on what the 'latest -stable' is. Nick -- "Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it." -Chinese Proverb - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/