From: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 23:26:42 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9
Cc: Nick Warne <nick@linicks.net>, "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
       Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       webmaster@kernel.org
References: <200601041710.37648.nick@linicks.net> <200601042249.12116.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <20060104231226.GC14788@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060104231226.GC14788@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200601042326.42740.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1047
Lines: 25

On Wednesday 04 January 2006 23:12, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:49:11PM +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > Re-read the thread. The confusion here is about "going back" to 2.6.14
> > before patching 2.6.15. This has nothing to do with "rc kernels". We have
> > this documented explicitly in the kernel but not on the kernel.org FAQ.
>
> The kernel.org FAQ does not deal with Linux kernel specific things, only
> kernel.org specific things.  So documenting it in the kernel itself is
> the proper place for it :)

The note on -rc kernels refutes this claim. How difficult it is really to 
modify the sentence?

-- 
Cheers,
Alistair.

'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.'
Third year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/