Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750737AbWADXoH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:44:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750743AbWADXoH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:44:07 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]:55517 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750737AbWADXoG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:44:06 -0500 X-Authenticated: #5082238 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 00:44:04 +0100 From: Carsten Otto To: Jesse Brandeburg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade Message-ID: <20060104234404.GA23314@carsten-otto.halifax.rwth-aachen.de> Reply-To: c-otto@gmx.de Mail-Followup-To: Jesse Brandeburg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20051219195458.GA23650@carsten-otto.halifax.rwth-aachen.de> <20060102121752.GA29275@carsten-otto.halifax.rwth-aachen.de> <4807377b0601041538t98275acn54a36374a42346ab@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4807377b0601041538t98275acn54a36374a42346ab@mail.gmail.com> X-GnuGP-Key: http://c-otto.de/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1476 Lines: 46 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:38:55PM -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > I'm not sure it's e1000, is there any chance you can try a different > network adapter (like not e1000 based)? with the ethtool diags error > there is something corrupting memory in your system or on your pci bus > (most likely) >=20 > My best recommendation is to check to make sure there aren't any bios > updates for your system, make sure you aren't running overclocked on > the pci bus, try different slots, try a different network adapter.=20 > Maybe you can try memtest86 overnight? >=20 > Honestly right now it doesn't sound like a network problem, but a > system problem. I forgot to answer here, sorry. The problem is solved, see here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/2/21 --=20 Carsten Otto c-otto@gmx.de www.c-otto.de --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFDvF3EjUF4jpCSQBQRApIhAJQJrQfVVnzWIXJPbd7cJHnWJnNHAKCXUNn3 b6ikzC5JzCWp/8shnMWTaQ== =7uwD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/