Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:44:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.3 000/166] 5.3.5-stable review
Message-ID: <20191007164411.GA1054518@kroah.com>
References: <20191006171212.850660298@linuxfoundation.org>
 <7148ff93-bac0-f78a-df3a-b9dbbee3db1a@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7148ff93-bac0-f78a-df3a-b9dbbee3db1a@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:25:35AM -0500, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> 
> On 10/6/19 12:19 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.3.5 release.
> > There are 166 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Tue 08 Oct 2019 05:07:10 PM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.3.5-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.3.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected.

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

> As mentioned, we found a problem with the mismatch of kselftests 5.3.1
> and net/udpgso.sh, but everything is fine.

That's good to hear!

greg k-h