Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Kill pr_warning in the whole linux code
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        AlexeiStarovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        GregKroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20190920062544.180997-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
 <20191002085554.ddvx6yx6nx7tdeey@pathway.suse.cz>
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <f613df39-6903-123b-a0f1-d1b783a755ce@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:39:32 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191002085554.ddvx6yx6nx7tdeey@pathway.suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi all,

On 2019/10/2 16:55, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Linus,
> 
> On Fri 2019-09-20 14:25:12, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> There are pr_warning and pr_warng to show WARNING level message,
>> most of the code using pr_warn, number based on next-20190919,
>>
>> pr_warn: 5189   pr_warning: 546 (tools: 398, others: 148)
> 
> The ratio is 10:1 in favor of pr_warn(). It would make sense
> to remove the pr_warning().
> 
> Would you accept pull request with these 32 simple patches
> for rc2, please?
> 
> Alternative is to run a simple sed. But it is not trivial
> to fix indentation of the related lines.

Kindly ping, should I respin patches with comments fixed?
Is the patchset acceptable, hope to be clear that what to do next :)

Thanks

> 
> Best Regards,
> Petr
> 
> .
>