Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp5618987ybp; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 05:57:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQyefIBACy4e1SlDbCCl24OFuCgbVn817d8WdQE2Xvy7Yj4nUER+8+8uaHZcrJlvDvItOx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:454c:: with SMTP id s12mr28390952ejq.69.1570539448411; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:57:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570539448; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cxOwUAF/p7Y8X267w48HPYf0aCeZLRu7KREyyb8fREizq/kW9ltIJsEVdjKLS6dOxm IUlw6rbZIS/rqSnGGyFR89+YAYVQAbwBDgANASGygOl0FyZCkop9xZeAKQ4da9ZobQiW dlWvMCoarR5b7hmumheS4kKKLGMddcl/iTLxtaFJ68iVFNGOa6gxkiULZ+2XtFm2EbPF fY1x/iekHMdhFC0UIVV5rPeOBR33efdVBdDPWPOW340eUHaPLDaaHWAmvXAO3KUtJdGd py1kBmOodnxZWBeeKQ+uzypke+t8R5YH+tIl2o+ysJa+qZfjRJ3QrBysqjACsv6KoYvZ PQIQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:autocrypt :openpgp:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=acVM2mMSDdjMC967n3wQurz0RylJGcmHJGrlQ2IYLlI=; b=TZXWe99NF3SkmWp3KIwYvJd0RsqcSpCk3WtL2CpYFnAmeB/4LchvBBJnPuFXGJvw7q Cg8MAln8ZI1x22RNpKAAgyiFjXZHgpUvIelk+I9oV6cvzO5N6HRGBtFJqJzvaNXRQld1 4YcFKdxXlshkQq5rtOxrf8T+o/4DCAeOML27vrFykXLkpt2b7hwKnOW7Lr7K0qQcgr6Y NmNo5iCHnSQ+wEEhYr+AOVE87LcHFm2+FosreGlVriirdPGX2ZzhUr5Iybb01iTFQYOZ xs8RqMZ5BxLMqKXrnmmRk8a21Yjil9bziHw31wR0bd/gK5lrh1gSrCL2vBWCg4Xsuy6Z 2xzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n8si8809464ejz.22.2019.10.08.05.57.05; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730763AbfJHM44 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:56:56 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:45580 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730371AbfJHM44 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:56:56 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x98CpusP078282 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:56:54 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vgs8jv435-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:56:53 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 13:56:51 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 8 Oct 2019 13:56:47 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x98CujvH52625654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:56:45 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B61511C04C; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:56:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2342111C050; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:56:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc7455500831.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.224.119]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:56:45 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_isolation: fix a deadlock with printk() To: Michal Hocko , Petr Mladek , Peter Oberparleiter Cc: Qian Cai , akpm@linux-foundation.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de, david@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik References: <1570228005-24979-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> <20191007143002.l37bt2lzqtnqjqxu@pathway.suse.cz> <20191007144937.GO2381@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191008074357.f33f6pbs4cw5majk@pathway.suse.cz> <20191008082752.GB6681@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Christian Borntraeger Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=borntraeger@de.ibm.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBE6cPPgBEAC2VpALY0UJjGmgAmavkL/iAdqul2/F9ONz42K6NrwmT+SI9CylKHIX+fdf J34pLNJDmDVEdeb+brtpwC9JEZOLVE0nb+SR83CsAINJYKG3V1b3Kfs0hydseYKsBYqJTN2j CmUXDYq9J7uOyQQ7TNVoQejmpp5ifR4EzwIFfmYDekxRVZDJygD0wL/EzUr8Je3/j548NLyL 4Uhv6CIPf3TY3/aLVKXdxz/ntbLgMcfZsDoHgDk3lY3r1iwbWwEM2+eYRdSZaR4VD+JRD7p8 0FBadNwWnBce1fmQp3EklodGi5y7TNZ/CKdJ+jRPAAnw7SINhSd7PhJMruDAJaUlbYaIm23A +82g+IGe4z9tRGQ9TAflezVMhT5J3ccu6cpIjjvwDlbxucSmtVi5VtPAMTLmfjYp7VY2Tgr+ T92v7+V96jAfE3Zy2nq52e8RDdUo/F6faxcumdl+aLhhKLXgrozpoe2nL0Nyc2uqFjkjwXXI OBQiaqGeWtxeKJP+O8MIpjyGuHUGzvjNx5S/592TQO3phpT5IFWfMgbu4OreZ9yekDhf7Cvn /fkYsiLDz9W6Clihd/xlpm79+jlhm4E3xBPiQOPCZowmHjx57mXVAypOP2Eu+i2nyQrkapaY IdisDQfWPdNeHNOiPnPS3+GhVlPcqSJAIWnuO7Ofw1ZVOyg/jwARAQABtDRDaHJpc3RpYW4g Qm9ybnRyYWVnZXIgKElCTSkgPGJvcm50cmFlZ2VyQGRlLmlibS5jb20+iQI4BBMBAgAiBQJO nDz4AhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRARe7yAtaYcfOYVD/9sqc6ZdYKD bmDIvc2/1LL0g7OgiA8pHJlYN2WHvIhUoZUIqy8Sw2EFny/nlpPVWfG290JizNS2LZ0mCeGZ 80yt0EpQNR8tLVzLSSr0GgoY0lwsKhAnx3p3AOrA8WXsPL6prLAu3yJI5D0ym4MJ6KlYVIjU ppi4NLWz7ncA2nDwiIqk8PBGxsjdc/W767zOOv7117rwhaGHgrJ2tLxoGWj0uoH3ZVhITP1z gqHXYaehPEELDV36WrSKidTarfThCWW0T3y4bH/mjvqi4ji9emp1/pOWs5/fmd4HpKW+44tD Yt4rSJRSa8lsXnZaEPaeY3nkbWPcy3vX6qafIey5d8dc8Uyaan39WslnJFNEx8cCqJrC77kI vcnl65HaW3y48DezrMDH34t3FsNrSVv5fRQ0mbEed8hbn4jguFAjPt4az1xawSp0YvhzwATJ YmZWRMa3LPx/fAxoolq9cNa0UB3D3jmikWktm+Jnp6aPeQ2Db3C0cDyxcOQY/GASYHY3KNra z8iwS7vULyq1lVhOXg1EeSm+lXQ1Ciz3ub3AhzE4c0ASqRrIHloVHBmh4favY4DEFN19Xw1p 76vBu6QjlsJGjvROW3GRKpLGogQTLslbjCdIYyp3AJq2KkoKxqdeQYm0LZXjtAwtRDbDo71C FxS7i/qfvWJv8ie7bE9A6Wsjn7kCDQROnDz4ARAAmPI1e8xB0k23TsEg8O1sBCTXkV8HSEq7 JlWz7SWyM8oFkJqYAB7E1GTXV5UZcr9iurCMKGSTrSu3ermLja4+k0w71pLxws859V+3z1jr nhB3dGzVZEUhCr3EuN0t8eHSLSMyrlPL5qJ11JelnuhToT6535cLOzeTlECc51bp5Xf6/XSx SMQaIU1nDM31R13o98oRPQnvSqOeljc25aflKnVkSfqWSrZmb4b0bcWUFFUKVPfQ5Z6JEcJg Hp7qPXHW7+tJTgmI1iM/BIkDwQ8qe3Wz8R6rfupde+T70NiId1M9w5rdo0JJsjKAPePKOSDo RX1kseJsTZH88wyJ30WuqEqH9zBxif0WtPQUTjz/YgFbmZ8OkB1i+lrBCVHPdcmvathknAxS bXL7j37VmYNyVoXez11zPYm+7LA2rvzP9WxR8bPhJvHLhKGk2kZESiNFzP/E4r4Wo24GT4eh YrDo7GBHN82V4O9JxWZtjpxBBl8bH9PvGWBmOXky7/bP6h96jFu9ZYzVgIkBP3UYW+Pb1a+b w4A83/5ImPwtBrN324bNUxPPqUWNW0ftiR5b81ms/rOcDC/k/VoN1B+IHkXrcBf742VOLID4 YP+CB9GXrwuF5KyQ5zEPCAjlOqZoq1fX/xGSsumfM7d6/OR8lvUPmqHfAzW3s9n4lZOW5Jfx bbkAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCTpw8+AIbDAAKCRARe7yAtaYcfPzbD/9WNGVf60oXezNzSVCL hfS36l/zy4iy9H9rUZFmmmlBufWOATjiGAXnn0rr/Jh6Zy9NHuvpe3tyNYZLjB9pHT6mRZX7 Z1vDxeLgMjTv983TQ2hUSlhRSc6e6kGDJyG1WnGQaqymUllCmeC/p9q5m3IRxQrd0skfdN1V AMttRwvipmnMduy5SdNayY2YbhWLQ2wS3XHJ39a7D7SQz+gUQfXgE3pf3FlwbwZhRtVR3z5u aKjxqjybS3Ojimx4NkWjidwOaUVZTqEecBV+QCzi2oDr9+XtEs0m5YGI4v+Y/kHocNBP0myd pF3OoXvcWdTb5atk+OKcc8t4TviKy1WCNujC+yBSq3OM8gbmk6NwCwqhHQzXCibMlVF9hq5a FiJb8p4QKSVyLhM8EM3HtiFqFJSV7F+h+2W0kDyzBGyE0D8z3T+L3MOj3JJJkfCwbEbTpk4f n8zMboekuNruDw1OADRMPlhoWb+g6exBWx/YN4AY9LbE2KuaScONqph5/HvJDsUldcRN3a5V RGIN40QWFVlZvkKIEkzlzqpAyGaRLhXJPv/6tpoQaCQQoSAc5Z9kM/wEd9e2zMeojcWjUXgg oWj8A/wY4UXExGBu+UCzzP/6sQRpBiPFgmqPTytrDo/gsUGqjOudLiHQcMU+uunULYQxVghC syiRa+UVlsKmx1hsEg== Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:56:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191008082752.GB6681@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19100812-0012-0000-0000-00000356174C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19100812-0013-0000-0000-00002191189D Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-08_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=65 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910080124 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adding Peter Oberparleiter. Peter, can you have a look? On 08.10.19 10:27, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 08-10-19 09:43:57, Petr Mladek wrote: >> On Mon 2019-10-07 16:49:37, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> [Cc s390 maintainers - the lockdep is http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1570228005-24979-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw >>> Petr has explained it is a false positive >>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191007143002.l37bt2lzqtnqjqxu@pathway.suse.cz] >>> On Mon 07-10-19 16:30:02, Petr Mladek wrote: >>> [...] >>>> I believe that it cannot really happen because: >>>> >>>> static int __init >>>> sclp_console_init(void) >>>> { >>>> [...] >>>> rc = sclp_rw_init(); >>>> [...] >>>> register_console(&sclp_console); >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> >>>> sclp_rw_init() is called before register_console(). And >>>> console_unlock() will never call sclp_console_write() before >>>> the console is registered. >>>> >>>> AFAIK, lockdep only compares existing chain of locks. It does >>>> not know about console registration that would make some >>>> code paths mutually exclusive. >>>> >>>> I believe that it is a false positive. I do not know how to >>>> avoid this lockdep report. I hope that it will disappear >>>> by deferring all printk() calls rather soon. >>> >>> Thanks a lot for looking into this Petr. I have also checked the code >>> and I really fail to see why the allocation has to be done under the >>> lock in the first place. sclp_read_sccb and sclp_init_sccb are global >>> variables but I strongly suspect that they need a synchronization during >>> early init, callbacks are registered only later IIUC: >> >> Good idea. It would work when the init function is called only once. >> But see below. >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp.c >>> index d2ab3f07c008..4b1c033e3255 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp.c >>> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp.c >>> @@ -1169,13 +1169,13 @@ sclp_init(void) >>> unsigned long flags; >>> int rc = 0; >>> >>> + sclp_read_sccb = (void *) __get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA); >>> + sclp_init_sccb = (void *) __get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA); >>> spin_lock_irqsave(&sclp_lock, flags); >>> /* Check for previous or running initialization */ >>> if (sclp_init_state != sclp_init_state_uninitialized) >>> goto fail_unlock; >> >> It seems that sclp_init() could be called several times in parallel. >> I see it called from sclp_register() and sclp_initcall(). > > Interesting. Something for s390 people to answer I guess. > Anyway, this should be quite trivial to workaround by a cmpxch or alike. >