Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752065AbWAEGkt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:40:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752066AbWAEGkt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:40:49 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:15558 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752065AbWAEGks (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:40:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of obsolete OSS drivers From: Lee Revell To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Michal Piotrowski , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060103114900.GA3831@stusta.de> <6bffcb0e0601030401n97997a0n@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 01:40:45 -0500 Message-Id: <1136443246.24475.6.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 919 Lines: 25 On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 13:46 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >[snip] > >> 124 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 90412 deletions(-) > > ^^^^^^^ > > Cool :) > > Since when is "-)" cool? > > > >PS. Greg's remove-devfs patch is also cool :). > > Oh yeah. When 2.6.0 got out, the kernel tree was 32475 KB. By 2.6.15, it is > already 38899 KB. Time to get some dust off :D Why is this a problem? The 2.6.15 kernel is capable of a lot more than 2.6.0. Of course it's bigger. Unless you have some magic toolchain that can add features without adding any code. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/