Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:29:00 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Maciej Falkowski <m.falkowski@samsung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: Force clkoutN names to be
 unique in PMU
Message-ID: <20191008142900.GA2635@pi3>
References: <20191004151414.8458-1-krzk@kernel.org>
 <CAL_JsqJDTcHu5oXG6zszGHCBhTE6EW94AANUjyMV78SkKcn5yA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191008125038.GA2550@pi3>
 <CAL_Jsq+GcsUWN6kjBLkyr1rHGh6_4=w6JL6+k7DBXkBcvHcSBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL_JsqKBzZCShxx99aB4z15XYNbUionVicmfNNXEfq=iohWLCA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKBzZCShxx99aB4z15XYNbUionVicmfNNXEfq=iohWLCA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:17:16AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 9:05 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:50 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:38:14AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:14 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The clkoutN names of clocks must be unique because they represent
> > > > > unique inputs of clock multiplexer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml | 6 ++++--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml
> > > > > index 73b56fc5bf58..d8e03716f5d2 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml
> > > > > @@ -53,8 +53,10 @@ properties:
> > > > >        List of clock names for particular CLKOUT mux inputs
> > > > >      minItems: 1
> > > > >      maxItems: 32
> > > > > -    items:
> > > > > -      pattern: '^clkout([0-9]|[12][0-9]|3[0-1])$'
> > > > > +    allOf:
> > > > > +      - items:
> > > > > +          pattern: '^clkout([0-9]|[12][0-9]|3[0-1])$'
> > > > > +      - uniqueItems: true
> > > >
> > > > You shouldn't need the 'allOf', just add uniqueItems at the same level as items.
> > >
> > > If you mean something like:
> > >   56     uniqueItems: true
> > >   57     items:
> > >   58       pattern: '^clkout([0-9]|[12][0-9]|3[0-1])$'
> > >
> > > Then the dt_binding_check fails:
> > >
> > > dev/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml: properties:clock-names:
> > > 'uniqueItems' is not one of ['$ref', 'additionalItems', 'additionalProperties', 'allOf', 'anyOf', 'const', 'contains', 'default', 'dependencies', 'deprecated', 'description', 'else', 'enum', 'items', 'if', 'minItems', 'minimum', 'maxItems', 'maximum', 'not', 'oneOf', 'pattern', 'patternProperties', 'properties', 'required', 'then', 'type', 'typeSize', 'unevaluatedProperties']
> >
> > I can add it.
> >
> > The other option is to fix this in the clock schema. I'm not sure if
> > there's a need for duplicate clock-names. Seems unlikely. I'll test
> > that.
> 
> Actually, clock-names is already set to be unique. Did you see otherwise?

Yeah, I duplicated on purpose "clkout1" and it was not reported as an
error. That's why I added "uniqueItems".

Best regards,
Krzysztof