Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:11:37 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        bristot@redhat.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com, hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke()
Message-ID: <20191008171137.GA22902@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20191007081716.07616230.8@infradead.org>
 <20191007081945.10951536.8@infradead.org>
 <20191008104335.6fcd78c9@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191008104335.6fcd78c9@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:43:35AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> BTW, I'd really like to take this patch series through my tree. That
> way I can really hammer it, as well as I have code that will be built
> on top of it.

Works for me; or we can have a topic branch in tip we both can use.
Ingo?

> I'll review the other series in this thread, but I'm assuming they
> don't rely on this series? Or do they?

Indeed, this series stands on it's own. The rest depends on this.