Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp505389ybp; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:58:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyBAVSq5aKSZqEA3S24jzg/QiKNE+E7qYQRKkBbfWh0pABJG7T5C+m1UmavwXRgyN/S+uwT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3b10:: with SMTP id g16mr1257574ejf.34.1570600725412; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 22:58:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570600725; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Slnr4cXAA8+e28wvjGHlaPKPLXWoyfjOKbqcsA/7kZqqzdSwgcXgzVlft+58Vubw5W f0bIySN8ijfdOsNe/i7nZS+LspT/ZZiXl0k9RU5oRs6Fz9ppJZXgktA49vmxS0cHOKDl n2QnGiQWxbE5/oUXdIsQOqGqBtHVyR2NWEbsDA4qsXH1ZKtAz/xQ+E1tOFA5aRWTMf+9 sfXmqSzxX0kNDcIXjmiDPL0+UN9WwtJGvFVv4pFW7UbmKTx7gLxZRo/YAUHJ3tW7Kvci 1+M3XQOa886GWs16qBBDZosCwLZ7/nN2lJApLQpTKL8K8hCv4rxTaSQ5862skp/n+2Eb YtCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=ORJyttxGSfAqpuIvcwwi5Yl5/k+nmwzrPFmK+d5MPSg=; b=NQKAKLTis9iKRgedf9UVuAVLuqiNH5owwA3VjMitkQgCH2qxfgDu3Hp4+Y2HktmKCw RPJf1gPCerfPvRmYesd04YTPnUbSCsnLm/nU2krXvCVHeeexI3azZh6KKTqrE4SZB8mY vtkOqYYhHeZrTQc0CABJwaD2zKmawCYrZ3zefgtTULnTdmvbI+jjubfg3r6k5kqA4CcE t1k1DjOpDyEzBU15KvLTMX5FKn2Pjn1BZBmi6T1RM+kQDAR6foTT95c98QvlH20Z83mV wnHo13NBfn8XZJuAe9saZbZxHIKoECNglNVRfVrn8QSh9v/wZxKlxi35QJeSwGVpeEEV TacA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q35si812032eda.122.2019.10.08.22.58.21; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 22:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728828AbfJIFzL (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 01:55:11 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:28095 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725838AbfJIFzL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 01:55:11 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Oct 2019 22:55:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,273,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="218521849" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.128]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2019 22:55:09 -0700 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:56:46 +0800 From: Yang Weijiang To: Jim Mattson Cc: Yang Weijiang , kvm list , LKML , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Aaron Lewis Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] kvm: vmx: Define CET VMCS fields and CPUID flags Message-ID: <20191009055646.GA27851@local-michael-cet-test> References: <20190927021927.23057-1-weijiang.yang@intel.com> <20190927021927.23057-3-weijiang.yang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:04:07AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:17 PM Yang Weijiang wrote: > > > > CET(Control-flow Enforcement Technology) is an upcoming Intel(R) > > processor feature that blocks Return/Jump-Oriented Programming(ROP) > > attacks. It provides the following capabilities to defend > > against ROP/JOP style control-flow subversion attacks: > > /* > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c > > index 9d282fec0a62..1aa86b87b6ab 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c > > @@ -365,13 +365,13 @@ static inline void do_cpuid_7_mask(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, int index) > > F(AVX512VBMI) | F(LA57) | F(PKU) | 0 /*OSPKE*/ | > > F(AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ) | F(UMIP) | F(AVX512_VBMI2) | F(GFNI) | > > F(VAES) | F(VPCLMULQDQ) | F(AVX512_VNNI) | F(AVX512_BITALG) | > > - F(CLDEMOTE) | F(MOVDIRI) | F(MOVDIR64B); > > + F(CLDEMOTE) | F(MOVDIRI) | F(MOVDIR64B) | F(SHSTK); > > > > /* cpuid 7.0.edx*/ > > const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features = > > F(AVX512_4VNNIW) | F(AVX512_4FMAPS) | F(SPEC_CTRL) | > > F(SPEC_CTRL_SSBD) | F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES) | F(INTEL_STIBP) | > > - F(MD_CLEAR); > > + F(MD_CLEAR) | F(IBT); > > Claiming that SHSTK and IBT are supported in the guest seems premature > as of this change, since you haven't actually done anything to > virtualize the features yet. > OK, will put the flags in other patch. > > /* cpuid 7.1.eax */ > > const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_1_eax_x86_features = > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > index fbffabad0370..a85800b23e6e 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > @@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr2, > > * Right now, no XSS states are used on x86 platform, > > * expand the macro for new features. > > */ > > -#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XSS (0) > > +#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XSS (XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER \ > > + | XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL) > > If IA32_XSS can dynamically change within the guest, it will have to > be enumerated by KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST. thanks for pointing it out, need to add IA32_XSS to msrs_to_save list. >(Note that Aaron Lewis is > working on a series which will include that enumeration, if you'd like > to wait.) I'm also not convinced that there is sufficient > virtualization of these features to allow these bits to be set in the > guest IA32_XSS at this point. > It's true CET is working in guest after I added XSS/XSAVES support in KVM and QEMU, but I'd like to look at Aaron's new patch... > > extern u64 host_xcr0; > > > > -- > > 2.17.2 > >