Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:24:55 +0200
From:   Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@nxp.com>
Cc:     "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        "kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        "festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some
 special SCU firmware APIs
Message-ID: <20191009082455.5hqhotkbozsr7mgo@pengutronix.de>
References: <1570410959-32563-1-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
 <20191007080135.4e5ljhh6z2rbx5bw@pengutronix.de>
 <AM6PR0402MB39118DABDE62496539D7EE6DF59A0@AM6PR0402MB3911.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR0402MB39118DABDE62496539D7EE6DF59A0@AM6PR0402MB3911.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Anson,

On 19-10-08 00:48, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Marco
> 
> > On 19-10-07 09:15, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message
> > > header's function element even the API has response data, those
> > > special APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they
> > > should be treated as return success always.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > 	- Use direct API check instead of calling another function to check.
> > > 	- This patch is based on
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> > >
> > hwork.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F11129553%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Canson.
> > huang%
> > >
> > 40nxp.com%7C2de0a6be69b74cc249ad08d74afc9730%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f
> > a92cd99
> > >
> > c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637060321046247040&amp;sdata=RMFAdLKGKb6
> > mEdhycrzHX
> > > R03E6Qr5pWyRc8Zk6ErlBc%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > 
> > Thanks for this v2. It would be good to change the callers within this series.
> 
> NOT quite understand your point, the callers does NOT need to be changed, those
> 2 special APIs callers are already following the right way of calling the APIs.

Ah okay. I searched the 5.4-rc2 tag and found the soc_uid_show() as only
user but this user sets the have_resp field to false. Is this intended?

Regards,
  Marco

> Anson