Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:09:43 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] string.h: Mark 34 functions with __must_check
Message-ID: <20191009110943.7ff3a08a@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <75f70e5e-9ece-d6d1-a2c5-2f3ad79b9ccb@web.de>
References: <75f70e5e-9ece-d6d1-a2c5-2f3ad79b9ccb@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:14:28 +0200
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:53:59 +0200
> 
> Several functions return values with which useful data processing
> should be performed. These values must not be ignored then.
> Thus use the annotation “__must_check” in the shown function declarations.
> 
> Add also corresponding parameter names for adjusted functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>

I'm curious. How many warnings showed up when you applied this patch?

-- Steve