Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp1771611ybp; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 20:16:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0iETUpuITPAB2yITrVfKEEOrgz5SwV8WP9d9h2RNYVPupK8raiDkcH5eJpaJJgQFuYr1X X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:36e:: with SMTP id rs14mr6045140ejb.280.1570677373034; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:16:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570677373; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xTGmv2TS3UU08QTGvgQfhxFSGC+ErCyTD72HwBn38YTjY2s+SC+ZK1TPikIJfbnw4h 7MH6rID5UoWhJmTGKaQe/CU2hd80ucL3NmNKEBfjAyf8lIPvUpCraYOorKfliAwXVx0e 9+pKwmDsTFaEpQ150/upqcEOxdq+NC/Fr3O7b7Gx1L4vGuGYGT3s5zili/Zuu6uFYQzA rJ+sjilbUSFjc+vEHlgsGXd/R4vf6VQxhz+7NWc54oawzyNH7jzMiPP+bv/wffeCkgXl ybEC3sjlganrIYu2MPezsrG1o6swSk5ULvmN+EoklKvSmvZrEcLPnMHjFJE8uhL20KzL sWuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=yqvViJB8OaGaeR3o1UlyB9TFU8xV+bgD6JJTYnFmeyI=; b=vLgWJ3EYNmWAE3QLXY/xB/wu2O7IICS5NIQnaYxcJQdNKeodAG5xmbKgCGeYaNRzcb 38T++5Tg3Ll5PPTZh09YJVNZNz7wgJT+72yXUNaRWoKkxlGOlhcd4R5mW2GfbekX5u/a MxLrbIIev3MMXIDbJqtma8d1VYZzle+Tt26uG9JXilhR4s/8fFeTemRE1lW4QvAtjFDO +OXhtcAOL+98QNEerJkMZtrPJul4rL/EuAUc5XUY6ODTctp3otceZ581J1vfgjDUNPCn LedxxZxclNLYMaEZAPDR7Ncpvpv9PPmmnthJOriE/X9SSIFMIsigBEquCZVwl/BDUJ59 H0tA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r24si2358015edy.417.2019.10.09.20.15.48; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732644AbfJJDPg (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 23:15:36 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:51238 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726427AbfJJDPg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 23:15:36 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2019 20:15:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,278,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="223801015" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2019 20:15:32 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:15:16 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Wei Yang Cc: Shakeel Butt , Qian Cai , Andrew Morton , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Rik van Riel , Linux MM , LKML , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: "reuse mergeable anon_vma as parent when fork" causes a crash on s390 Message-ID: <20191010031516.GA5060@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <1570656570.5937.24.camel@lca.pw> <20191010023601.GA4793@richard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191010023601.GA4793@richard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:36:01AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >Hi, Qian, Shakeel > >Thanks for testing. > >Sounds I missed some case to handle. anon_vma_clone() now would be called in >vma_adjust, which is a different case when it is introduced. > Well, I have to correct my statement. The reason is we may did something more in anon_vma_clone(). Here is a quick fix, while I need to go through all the cases carefully. diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index 12f6c3d7fd9d..2844f442208d 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src) * 1. Parent has vm_prev, which implies we have vm_prev. * 2. Parent and its vm_prev have the same anon_vma. */ - if (pprev && pprev->anon_vma == src->anon_vma) + if (!dst->anon_vma && pprev && pprev->anon_vma == src->anon_vma) dst->anon_vma = prev->anon_vma; list_for_each_entry_reverse(pavc, &src->anon_vma_chain, same_vma) { >BTW, do you have the specific test case? So that I could verify my change. The >kernel build test doesn't trigger this. > >Thanks a lot :-) > >On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:21:11PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: >-- >Wei Yang >Help you, Help me -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me