Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932112AbWAEPmw (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:42:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932105AbWAEPi2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:38:28 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205]:9455 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932097AbWAEPhy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:37:54 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FF42bRn/liwodvq0hgnRpEAFhJT3IikiO7wh4bYsOktdrR1yodMA896vuEiBf0M0WMZKjmIcnPWeiO03X9dQG9Se8Qtwcx3/NnzjHJehAF8FEGdl4Fs+SDRxhhnXbD+HsgGlBV2nHNRF9E+sgj0YC+IjgINTnTcBts8XOYyhr0s= Message-ID: <9a8748490601050737y24f04505hb605fbe96fe4f92c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:37:53 +0100 From: Jesper Juhl To: Alistair John Strachan Subject: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Greg KH , Nick Warne , "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200601051525.05613.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200601041710.37648.nick@linicks.net> <200601042249.12116.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <43BC636D.3070109@zytor.com> <200601051525.05613.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1358 Lines: 30 On 1/5/06, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Thursday 05 January 2006 00:08, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > > Re-read the thread. The confusion here is about "going back" to 2.6.14 > > > before patching 2.6.15. This has nothing to do with "rc kernels". We have > > > this documented explicitly in the kernel but not on the kernel.org FAQ. > > > > If you can send me some suggested verbiage I'll put it in the FAQ. We > > can also make a page that's directly linked from the "stable release", > > kind of like we have info links for -mm patches etc. > > I hope somebody else here can minimise my logic; I think the verbosity is > necessary to completely explain the "patch nightmare" to everybody concerned. > [snip] Nice writeup, but why not simply put a copy of Documentation/applying-patches.txt online and link to that? It contains more or less the same stuff you just wrote. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/