Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp2040360ybp; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:04:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyAqCs//+iqkNeEZjyS4xKIreJDDHbXMyZwUGoHIyk498FFbzAWTWBv2jYTwug0DrV6TGRK X-Received: by 2002:a50:e40c:: with SMTP id d12mr6765847edm.256.1570694684771; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:04:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570694684; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CByCxZESfuQSoZOKcSyyjWcpvN9lklLgz/3ff+WYlXhM/ji8UdDcmBTniPP0dLIWd8 zXj4fwkrzcpir59+n6TrLZKG2HbEtkzmEzz46d4PjO4Om5PqQIs2ZU16pEqd93afApJZ ck+DVbsw+lc98+UbsjY+meFKybchLbrs44IpSCgeF6ReTam6EiUiNbpwJa4g4yNEl6gd UDKW6XQemqrYUh3Bo7O+53Xs4+hUWcghA/Te3yJPw89V93jK0W8AAJFpJLuKrGa3Eidd wUyjCVwqEa1AwSXTQRSPz9Bzd5/e7JgpaaABcq70PpVTNJFY7gqAXc6twuzWyDMTz9J/ VWZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=tlo1xIShsucyvfNJekXe72qo0vfWhsYNLnbaxeilZAA=; b=yiqM7I0P3hhWbRE9AsjXxv2pi5nLYj9WALHU8CSA9NEgXBv8GfeCNkQb0p5Wr6hove WEeWBmhWMepx33ZM823oKSHNbJdphIju6zJW6Xxt0HpSWRr9BcRO1qS6eKGJ+P+USmCr 7lQYqlamnYBHH3GoV3c/EJvhdywHmWJxTjfhxSNQTv9N0p0iRmGAlBzYb7NhglUR2iXL dr8kH3WaV/ioJS0NXfnCm4WFbCDtrDGVvF1s1FYZ6FhReQ7PiNhezWluduavvQTfhB4B 2nlEuN5Hlip6JZXs2zFn2Y1AsRFrPKrogBwx5JDRzVtu8kSdEJuKbI+Fm+IhAq5HNoLP m/qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GY8NzSbx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d5si2651854edq.60.2019.10.10.01.04.20; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GY8NzSbx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733151AbfJJICO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:02:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:34635 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733115AbfJJICN (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:02:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id j11so6606993wrp.1; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tlo1xIShsucyvfNJekXe72qo0vfWhsYNLnbaxeilZAA=; b=GY8NzSbx80TpUmG1jzklT8s5/8BJyLTJwc9aYbZG96VV1AfD+gHXCCkoA+8ozBQfK5 B9GEXFg1a4+AfHMIOmFnQ1hLdCBA/lnJ6P8N7NHaVGvFnI39+V7RiCVpRIcXByCb3Hhj U3uYms9zV82CUieATD77NotYBJbSNsT9VNm3AWFhKh0UDEKZck/HkdNsClsrqMVQKVX3 kgLQUvXljNqcjiLDl7cB54fTnLZlzHNLz0gLHbJo9tGY2z66c1Ir0mmVBpbNPaBn2Acu brrI0R5ptPbb06kfQErY7pEi9wHWSbp+zmlkQYHDYTfO1smIRDr5TEPHwVWWtXAdkISP rRrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tlo1xIShsucyvfNJekXe72qo0vfWhsYNLnbaxeilZAA=; b=LtE43gbJPMg/S7LGgKhvCXOSfuz8ULVZm6j4xOiNQ7Yo7UaheHJrPr+95XO3Nrur0L Tbvsanlq8yReUvh2TxpIDGDpL3Tn6hqQPGyh5uugaFPdglq+lFFfVHZCn/vETk6oAvi5 1sYwtr6Bis1n3L3gyv0G5gKutYcu+QGiDC8S5Kqty7VONFKiobUrdBqgobmaAu5NpxMI /3Jldy/PNAvViAFg1u68ttM3Y436o3zyTNtH2Wxam37gw7RA2PqKiRzJXQlB5sP13QF0 TAo+xUImlOd7LKivkwJks7L5vun2a6rnvXeCCNyJX6ObXzAYXvTRyX90gG2dvNqC6j7p O6vw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpBwOyc8y91ltT06BrRHCCxMj9fLFqa5y+wXzULAvQRS1TfRD0 PYVP7lMbZseKPAfDWEQfKk8= X-Received: by 2002:adf:a50b:: with SMTP id i11mr7574644wrb.308.1570694531287; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j1sm9094519wrg.24.2019.10.10.01.02.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:02:07 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Airlie , DRI , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chris Wilson , Qian Cai Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20191010080207.GA22099@gmail.com> References: <20191010131448.482da2b2@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191010131448.482da2b2@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c: In function 'intel_gt_resume': > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c:183:54: error: macro "mutex_release" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 > 183 | mutex_release(&ce->pin_mutex.dep_map, 0, _THIS_IP_); > | ^ > In file included from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:18, > from include/linux/spinlock.h:83, > from include/linux/mmzone.h:8, > from include/linux/gfp.h:6, > from include/linux/slab.h:15, > from include/linux/io-mapping.h:10, > from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:36, > from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c:7: > include/linux/lockdep.h:605: note: macro "mutex_release" defined here > 605 | #define mutex_release(l, i) lock_release(l, i) > | > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c: In function '__context_pin_release': > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:245:51: error: macro "mutex_release" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 > 245 | mutex_release(&ce->pin_mutex.dep_map, 0, _RET_IP_); > | ^ > In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:6, > from include/linux/interrupt.h:11, > from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:134: > include/linux/lockdep.h:605: note: macro "mutex_release" defined here > 605 | #define mutex_release(l, i) lock_release(l, i) > | > > Caused by commit > > 5facae4f3549 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release()") > > interacting with commits > > dffa8feb3084 ("drm/i915/perf: Assert locking for i915_init_oa_perf_state()") > fcde8c7eea60 ("drm/i915/selftests: Exercise potential false lite-restore") > b1e3177bd1d8 ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex") > > from the drm tree. > > I added the following merge fix patch for today: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:08:43 +1100 > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: update for mutex_release API change > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) I suspect -next will have to carry this semantic merge conflict resolution until the DRM tree is merged upstream. Thanks, Ingo