Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp2072939ybp; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:41:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw08EB+dP2VlACb+58JwHu88zc7TyC8KSTOrFoI3gYh0mCHZYDseUHRHqTyiR1ozZ2z6QJE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4d95:: with SMTP id s21mr6880190eju.175.1570696887747; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:41:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570696887; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=00dgS3C9EnL7Bt5AsQi8OfpoP7laJveP+uXlvmXBhvx2m3j7E5D+8x7JGntY/KpAA4 qn6Oa/4K5ndjX51MONUVNbavUup1UNxM8emGsDTDryQGthsglw+Ngb3MCgQZrumWoWL/ D3xZr1z2qk2nXvpQAa9eaRX/DhSWBzSZn/gt5qBxSa6rX6TGLh5wfdLdAjn4j4SH3X9m FoIcrw+crAO3Uu+NhdxDSvHQ+MmQqNXUgpqR85pDb3hR3XtNKyOEYDi0gvrCimsqEHt3 JFmwu/c0ZK5LmLIjauJ7wPyUqIDhSg9pUB+iCti58Hr4CNK8xerO9eRbdRRjLTaD0gIw cWSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=42sItMr/D5Wq+0dBHN6jU3FpIi4hpB3vOynEYa+fIL4=; b=NIHAHoTHAlOFzd+VlrN+V0O1sy8c8fZvJzngblvY+vNo8n51RY8IOpsY052Wy6zuEE jQEQiHLuifg1cGFucdHXo2Czp5ARGJ267zKijmoom3Lfn8V0OwlUJcKTQ/aPPz15pFnW 8HaKw4hxvywYNKP5oqMGT1zIQ2eNCBaVd1uvJzN6NlNFlmJ3294O6cuIT2FKcInKL5dU /bJ7fpFCGco73kOjOMjplLodDtyKSNDhjOKKh35LZh5QDF1nS7gunKaAnedwxjDZfi+C 21Z1DFhXqbFfE4gVjPcz759it8H0qh3IlrEzokAphyQpo+sXd3NNOZdZsyejjn5FjN+b G9Yw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=dhYSWNgK; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l54si3323541edb.206.2019.10.10.01.41.04; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=dhYSWNgK; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388034AbfJJIkE (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:40:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:37205 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388013AbfJJIkD (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:40:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id p14so6761333wro.4 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=42sItMr/D5Wq+0dBHN6jU3FpIi4hpB3vOynEYa+fIL4=; b=dhYSWNgKFNmhHl0NqJPT5ow3NshhQlWKNtRKhTYeImMosjkghw2gL/3AHxLstTJLOq eWCcECIzT4ogDpaZxN75m/JiyPIULduxX0ro0OQHY+2tFch+y8k/bphJ8nAC+c21WhnV Y626DgddgNawu0J2OpQ1MjSzzPWVJXuCtm1OfUkmP1sZBVTRSqLSf2zV8uck2MlUmSxp DeidlZqJZRkedsTnLiV3oc6+v7KlInIBTdaGYfnoe1fN8SK2Ww+Yv2mGT6zigAvVlWj4 Mfo1S8aKgdZF0CkzW1eYAXrOclMiSPcjiCx6/vl+cEEkKjCbJeMYOmTjnm05dgQHw8Gr Df0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=42sItMr/D5Wq+0dBHN6jU3FpIi4hpB3vOynEYa+fIL4=; b=R0Ljlc+zM5LkfwrgOybCxjweyBU8Ye1phqaLvMyACCgcksPPIvrXpcigdI1OtnC/M7 M1BMSoOV3p+bmGFmPFPKCVGSKgHiRHTiJJWAvU2p8vcWVxE6kuKZ4lf9eJdLEcskKv7u JJrnxXwvrqQbC3yrNvdLVnQyOsGqbvUeEfji4PnDg7YG16BP/zmZFWNBVuk1BxjFo6e+ OkoTFORSS5cMG/1/57w1yqA3tnEJY78qMqXcQYyiwMH1I9eWnkQfzFYguPXhY4uvFWsB mOTCgkcO6fddUKB9RawOz+vvffMSKWl3nY/8m/RrPUJUe6Bw/01q9W5+dO6os55njWHe 8SqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU3QxaoeGbVK3Vj0P2IDRjdkwBeI4iUf0EwfQFBzPpfxap8rcvO jPmu3Ahj2Hhf9QS71yPPaxBRfvkAONI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e9c6:: with SMTP id l6mr7270590wrn.156.1570696800479; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([85.163.43.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m18sm6742626wrg.97.2019.10.10.01.39.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:39:58 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Michal Kubecek Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jiri Pirko , Johannes Berg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: do not parse attributes for families with zero maxattr Message-ID: <20191010083958.GD2223@nanopsycho> References: <20191009164432.AD5D1E3785@unicorn.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191009164432.AD5D1E3785@unicorn.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:32PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote: >Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing >to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute >parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function >genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls >__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own >parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of >genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute >type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or >warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace. > >Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses >the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the >same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit(). This is the original code before the changes: if (ops->doit == NULL) return -EOPNOTSUPP; if (family->maxattr && family->parallel_ops) { attrbuf = kmalloc_array(family->maxattr + 1, sizeof(struct nlattr *), GFP_KERNEL); if (attrbuf == NULL) return -ENOMEM; } else attrbuf = family->attrbuf; if (attrbuf) { enum netlink_validation validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT; if (ops->validate & GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT) validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL; err = __nlmsg_parse(nlh, hdrlen, attrbuf, family->maxattr, family->policy, validate, extack); if (err < 0) goto out; } Looks like the __nlmsg_parse() is called no matter if maxattr if 0 or not. It is only considered for allocation of attrbuf. This is in-sync with the current code. For dumpit, the check was there: if (family->maxattr) { unsigned int validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT; if (ops->validate & GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP_STRICT) validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL; rc = __nla_validate(nlmsg_attrdata(nlh, hdrlen), nlmsg_attrlen(nlh, hdrlen), family->maxattr, family->policy, validate, extack); if (rc) return rc; } > >Fixes: c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing to a separate function") >Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek >--- > net/netlink/genetlink.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c >index ecc2bd3e73e4..c4bf8830eedf 100644 >--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c >+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c >@@ -639,21 +639,23 @@ static int genl_family_rcv_msg_doit(const struct genl_family *family, > const struct genl_ops *ops, > int hdrlen, struct net *net) > { >- struct nlattr **attrbuf; >+ struct nlattr **attrbuf = NULL; > struct genl_info info; > int err; > > if (!ops->doit) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >+ if (!family->maxattr) >+ goto no_attrs; > attrbuf = genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse(family, nlh, extack, > ops, hdrlen, > GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT, >- family->maxattr && > family->parallel_ops); > if (IS_ERR(attrbuf)) > return PTR_ERR(attrbuf); > >+no_attrs: > info.snd_seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq; > info.snd_portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid; > info.nlhdr = nlh; >-- >2.23.0 >