Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751347AbWAETE4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:04:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751908AbWAETE4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:04:56 -0500 Received: from 200-77-196-210.ctetij.cablered.com.mx ([200.77.196.210]:19329 "EHLO server.alvarezp.pri") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbWAETEz (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:04:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:00:41 -0800 From: "Octavio Alvarez" To: "Dave Jones" , "Arjan van de Ven" Subject: Re: mm/rmap.c negative page map count BUG. Cc: "Andrew Morton" , nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060103082609.GB11738@redhat.com> <43BA630F.1020805@yahoo.com.au> <20060103135312.GB18060@redhat.com> <20060104155326.351a9c01.akpm@osdl.org> <20060105074718.GF20809@redhat.com> <1136448712.2920.4.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060105111520.GL20809@redhat.com> Organization: (None) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed delsp=yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060105111520.GL20809@redhat.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (Win32, build 7700) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1471 Lines: 37 On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 03:15:20 -0800, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > Quite a few Fedora users have hit it over the last year, > > > but what I find fascinating is that there's not a single > > > occurance of "BUG at mm/rmap.c" in our 2.6.9 based RHEL4 bug > reports. > > > > could mean it's caused by consumer hardware code... > > Yeah. People buying enterprise distros do tend to buy branded RAM > with goodies like ECC from big name suppliers instead of a cheap $20 > noname DIMM from "Joe's computers". > > So it *could* be a lot of these are crappy hardware, especially > as some of the reports do indicate that the problem went away > when they upgraded their RAM. Some of the others though, I'm > not so sure. Nevertheless, there are more instances of the bug in recent versions. For me, version 2.6.10 or 2.6.11 seems to be the big difference, from 1 bug monthly to --suddenly-- 4 weekly. I'm experiecing that problem too. I have notice that sometimes "bad_page_state" trigger before the BUG is reported. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/14/449 I have already installed the instrumentation Dave provided. I'll see how it goes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/