Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/15] samples/bpf: use own flags but not
 HOSTCFLAGS
To:     Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>, ast@kernel.org,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, yhs@fb.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, hawk@kernel.org,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
        ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org
References: <20191011002808.28206-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
 <20191011002808.28206-10-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Message-ID: <99f76e2f-ed76-77e0-a470-36ae07567111@cogentembedded.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:49:38 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191011002808.28206-10-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

    More grammar nitpicking...

On 11.10.2019 3:28, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:

> While compiling natively, the host's cflags and ldflags are equal to
> ones used from HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTLDFLAGS. When cross compiling it
> should have own, used for target arch. While verification, for arm,

    While verifying.

> arm64 and x86_64 the following flags were used always:
> 
> -Wall -O2
> -fomit-frame-pointer
> -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wstrict-prototypes
> 
> So, add them as they were verified and used before adding
> Makefile.target and lets omit "-fomit-frame-pointer" as were proposed
> while review, as no sense in such optimization for samples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
[...]

MBR, Sergei