Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:07:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:07:00 -0500 Received: from mail-out.chello.nl ([213.46.240.7]:16424 "EHLO amsmta02-svc.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:06:55 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 01:14:43 +0100 (CET) From: Igmar Palsenberg To: "Jeff V. Merkey" cc: root@chaos.analogic.com, Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sendmail-bugs@sendmail.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue] In-Reply-To: <3A0C5EDC.3F30BE9C@timpanogas.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > It ran out of memory. The file got sent fine after I got rid of > > all the memory-consumers. Looks like a sendmail bug where they > > expect to load a whole file into memory all at once before sending > > it. I always thought you could read from a file, then write to > > a socket. Maybe I'm old fashioned. Sending a 50 MB file is OK here. So it's not a TCP/IP bug. > Claus, > > Looks like your bug. As an FYI, sendmail.rpms in Suse, RedHat, and > OpenLinux all exhibit this behavior, which means they're all broken. > Reading an entire file into memory must be a BSD feature. I have > enabled an SSH account for you, so you can come in and debug. Richard > also can get in and will be helping. > > Jeff Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/