Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:33:42 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: configs: unset CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
Message-ID: <20191011103342.GL25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20190926193030.5843-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
 <20190926193030.5843-5-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
 <bf5db3a5-96da-752c-49ea-d0de899882d5@huawei.com>
 <CADYN=9LB9RHgRkQj=HcKDz1x9jqmT464Kseh2wZU5VvcLit+bQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <d978673e-cbd1-5ab5-b2a4-cdb407d0f98c@huawei.com>
 <CAK8P3a0kBz1-i-3miCo1vMuoM39ivXa3oxOE9VnCqDO-nfNOxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191011102747.lpbaur2e4nqyf7sw@willie-the-truck>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191011102747.lpbaur2e4nqyf7sw@willie-the-truck>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:27:48AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Does anybody use BIG_ENDIAN? If we're not even building it then maybe we
> should get rid of it altogether on arm64. I don't know of any supported
> userspace that supports it or any CPUs that are unable to run little-endian
> binaries.

32-bit ARM experience is that telco class users really like big
endian.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up