Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp837408ybp; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:15:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWk8vSOkbtRE+p4mfFfVOri7ajB2h6n/kps3K11w4TYOlP/iCeJGZ2yHN+orvS3J4r+8jL X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c2c1:: with SMTP id ch1mr12881188ejb.321.1570796155194; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:15:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570796155; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PJwTMu0yS3JvWLntnzpRuThgxTQvMMnUm1kffs7gCEuOJxGTwj8GtVJj2SEkMPIYO8 QbjaeAt9CfIOMuwCJ21BbiMojtXgecejrF5oBbgDKv6Zos+Ty/Rtq3fjSu3WXcIBU5No toWhG3S5HzoMfJS9T8luE9sogA5BFtsiDJZzzC8MMOg2aQMAbMqtZQqmwjbNLGH1NGG4 7T7vzD2rHWZ/Ir/PAkOm2oea5+5k8+6wXKWjaAJOPkReFqftc5LEFEnFH7iI2JBoFP8+ lR6sqQHMzU1zaL+Rxy9SB1KBpcGGVnu8Xzmt4/clfTxxXUctggZq90f3qIebkUtnh+oj CrOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=CkAdwjUD7I6FuuKA0Ly+Zq2sA8PwFQiGaEjwiKJ+zDA=; b=uVcnSy9w3Kwd/eNfAQwAw+7Q6a1lRfmGjij/hsefrBPdTd/Z1LvXVOZrkfZEK3tP5b XvqbdmbseshplltRkuC1FxaONimHvhZVa/3K03oaADZVsb6QmUqeu4/Wk/88dbCH06Y/ ST8p92dvX6aP/PG8TxoAamm0Us/EDNOuISauf05UeC6CyR+jezxH9fo8FITIvf+3SRVH ohlzdLbOeHAWsS3Bm7p0Pc87L1M6CFjjXG/ydgvVvPKYsOR7dvMVqIooEMKQr8MPPQE0 7hp/wQ22KAutfw+SbQuFYhKrKbLRVMz6ULwmn7AX2opNEkXx5SHc3IAJA31cI3bhtjIc JOwg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt13si5110535edb.245.2019.10.11.05.15.30; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728027AbfJKMOu (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:14:50 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:18740 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727198AbfJKMOt (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:14:49 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Oct 2019 05:14:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,284,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="207416820" Received: from oham-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO caravaggio) ([10.252.27.40]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2019 05:14:47 -0700 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:14:47 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Fail GED probe when not on hardware-reduced Message-ID: <20191011121447.GA4256@caravaggio> References: <20191009130433.29134-1-sameo@linux.intel.com> <20191009130433.29134-2-sameo@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:38:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:04 PM Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > > The Generic Event Device (GED) is a hardware-reduced platform device. > > No, it is not AFAICS. It's a little confusing, I was not sure what's the common understanding and tried to be safe by not having non HW-reduced machines getting a new device that they've never seen so far. > The spec doesn't say that GED cannot be used on platforms that aren't > HW-reduced I agree. > and if evged.c is going to be built in unconditionally, the > kernel will be able to handle GED regardless. Ok, perfect then. Does that mean you're ok with the 2nd patch but are going to drop this one? Cheers, Samuel.