Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276669AbRJKSYl>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:24:41 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276665AbRJKSYb>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:24:31 -0400
Received: from freeside.toyota.com ([63.87.74.7]:59145 "EHLO toyota.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S276670AbRJKSYT>;
	Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:24:19 -0400
Message-ID: <3BC5E3AF.588D0A55@lexus.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:23:44 -0700
From: J Sloan <jjs@lexus.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.11 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Moore <timothymoore@bigfoot.com>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which kernel (Linus or ac)?
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011011094548.jkp@riker.nailed.org> <3BC5E152.3D81631@bigfoot.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Tim Moore wrote:

> Any special reason to use 2.4?

er... scalability, performance, features?

> I only use 2.2.19p8 and 2.2.20p10 where
> stability is important.

experimental pre-releases? interesting...

All my 2.4 based servers are running quite
reliably - the oldest now have over180 days
uptime, all have been up since install or last
kernel with no hint of instability.

Red Hat and Late -ac kernels are especially
stable examples of 2.4 -

cu

jjs






-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/