Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:14:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:14:10 -0500 Received: from natted.Sendmail.COM ([63.211.143.38]:14182 "EHLO wiz.Sendmail.COM") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:14:02 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:12:32 -0800 From: Claus Assmann To: Igmar Palsenberg Cc: "Jeff V. Merkey" , root@chaos.analogic.com, Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sendmail-bugs@sendmail.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue] Message-ID: <20001110151232.A16552@sendmail.com> Reply-To: sendmail-bugs@sendmail.org In-Reply-To: <3A0C5EDC.3F30BE9C@timpanogas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 11, 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > > > It ran out of memory. The file got sent fine after I got rid of > > > all the memory-consumers. Looks like a sendmail bug where they > > > expect to load a whole file into memory all at once before sending > > > it. I always thought you could read from a file, then write to As I wrote before: this is just wrong. sendmail doesn't load the file into memory. > > > a socket. Maybe I'm old fashioned. > > Sending a 50 MB file is OK here. So it's not a TCP/IP bug. Ok, hopefully this reaches everyone who has been "involved" by Jeff into this "problem". It turned out that this was just a misconfiguration on his box (the load average exceeded the limit of his sendmail). Can we please close this case now? Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/