Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp4616824ybp; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzOW3b9Wlj/xWJD0259yTv+SDptl5OT8os10vVKWp0EcFXP61iemQcTk9QxyuaE7dzSgguY X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:794:: with SMTP id d20mr8422117edy.240.1571063274294; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571063274; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kcinRoI0CE7y2law2a70mZN+8jR02cZ/qYpBLDQw+uTrJeUcqgrBktwkUeEZ8q2Dj4 oun4RSAXX5tSZcwZtwIR40/bkUhjSe06rWZFZU3TNe9AtBwyxJBncTigGk1QaDITCcP1 vfH8qdBIfLZJMqMWsua4td216S9mOzx8BOF5K+5v09yIiONsgPWq9ykQKrlceaArRLpu dKNfmtA623DNJGm1VLanZHWsL/mXWrrX/2BTsaDuGOLVA0n+EpKU+2boxhC8eKKlVO37 s4VzC/s2OzhfjWCCHRCaFJC3EHKLdt3NQW1uUujfbv0yfkU6NRHH9r9slfzJVrIl9Pjr 7GAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=/nkp44UeRvaAEt+lAZCwAytZ7f8U+QL0LtKLISsBEW0=; b=lFyEYaNSbhz8ASLS07w76J0P/5dl7vxDJmX33nbD1fCwCtsNGoOO3/Od6XVoI/29ps vQcq7nAjbfLOxI151VDZ5O70XTLJRIJ6F7icXXaB40K2pYyJvM9/vECFsdc4sOzWuKQh 2x9r3YiuNiG4xGEi+EWthv7TJ8FAiIKxNDl7DqOboX50I+QZ718TI0cT8TSQwqEO/dZ5 RM7BLV7ZFCQGZm+KbhAw5/axIjpeTnKwd138HVC8obs1CztM2SKc2FIcAgqPpcCCIXfO DpWsWTm/fHfP3kZZXlzxh4hjkR+WTns01UeRy5r2Maza0ha5uSXecaVQhhOVzqd45Vej VIvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 13si12800384edw.357.2019.10.14.07.27.30; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732398AbfJNO0Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:26:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40630 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732262AbfJNO0Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:26:24 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDACCB8F7; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:26:20 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: Miroslav Benes Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, jikos@kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ftrace: Introduce PERMANENT ftrace_ops flag Message-ID: <20191014142620.dg3oiush5twd26ly@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20191014105923.29607-1-mbenes@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191014105923.29607-1-mbenes@suse.cz> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170912 (1.9.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 2019-10-14 12:59:23, Miroslav Benes wrote: > Livepatch uses ftrace for redirection to new patched functions. It means > that if ftrace is disabled, all live patched functions are disabled as > well. Toggling global 'ftrace_enabled' sysctl thus affect it directly. > It is not a problem per se, because only administrator can set sysctl > values, but it still may be surprising. > > Introduce PERMANENT ftrace_ops flag to amend this. If the > FTRACE_OPS_FL_PERMANENT is set on any ftrace ops, the tracing cannot be > disabled by disabling ftrace_enabled. Equally, a callback with the flag > set cannot be registered if ftrace_enabled is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes Looks fine to me. I finally understand which ftrace_enabled toggle we are talking about ;-) Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek > --- > - return codes. I chose EBUSY, because it seemed the least > inappropriate. I usually pick the wrong one, so suggestions are > welcome. -EBUSY is perfectly fine in ftrace_enable_sysctl(). It is not ideal in __register_ftrace_function(). But it still looks better than -ENODEV there. Best Regards, Petr