Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20191011191521.179614-4-saravanak@google.com>
References: <20191011191521.179614-1-saravanak@google.com> <20191011191521.179614-4-saravanak@google.com>
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>, kernel-team@android.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] docs: driver-model: Add documentation for sync_state
User-Agent: alot/0.8.1
Date:   Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:28:28 -0700
Message-Id: <20191014232828.DA62E217F9@mail.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Saravana Kannan (2019-10-11 12:15:21)
> The sync_state() driver callback was added recently, but the
> documentation was missing.  Adding it now.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> ---
>  .../driver-api/driver-model/driver.rst        | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>=20
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/driver.rst b/Documenta=
tion/driver-api/driver-model/driver.rst
> index 11d281506a04..baa6a85c8287 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/driver.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/driver.rst
> @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ A driver's probe() may return a negative errno value=
 to indicate that
>  the driver did not bind to this device, in which case it should have
>  released all resources it allocated::
> =20
> +       void (*sync_state)(struct device *dev);

This is only in -next as far as I can tell. Will this be combined with a
resend of the patch series that introduces this hook?