Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:41:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:41:28 -0400 Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com ([64.40.111.31]:6674 "HELO smtp1.hushmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:41:12 -0400 Message-Id: <200110111418.f9BEI9998195@mailserver1.hushmail.com> From: jkniiv@hushmail.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Alan Cox" , "Bonds, Deanna" Subject: Re: Re: Dilemma: Replace Escalade with Adaptec 2400A or Promise Super Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 07:18:09 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:25:43 +0100 (BST), Alan Cox wrote: >> >> We have monitoring/management tools available from http://linux.adaptec.com >> . It is the dptapps package. They are not open source but they are tested >> and released for various distributions of Linux. > >Question: What is involved in persuading ADaPTec to provide at least enough >information for the basic monitoring facilities - so that either the kenrel >or open source tools can be written to log errors, triggere rebuilds etc >from the command line ? > >Alan Yes, as always a valid concern. We need the resilience of open source drivers. And simple monitoring shouldn't be seen as added value. // Jarkko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Hush 2.0 wlsEARECABsFAjvFqgUUHGprbmlpdkBodXNobWFpbC5jb20ACgkQlshdxPYU0CYzJgCg s09sdSEdy0TOzTLDI9nUUt5ZRbsAnjM1ojJQqHDrGF5pD5bcBf/T2Uih =slnC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/