Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp6394496ybp; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:22:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHCAaHlabfGd9yUsHcbjjZgtlwSDVN+NGH3QiUCUe8JQNYmZlbHCTw3aHvvpP2BUDtyA0D X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7c57:: with SMTP id g23mr36282126ejp.116.1571174555562; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:22:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571174555; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i8QNLBrZBqLYTf8M3OeKdp8djj4u7SaAHDHDknlLFiUdMbDeReXTBmZ3Cc2xGiTFPO t0wLfFh4CIdFN2pQOWDbwY6qIUWUJG7GvMIdSIGCHnhISa19Unl7Ncl6eTl3lEPHuT3/ iLZnZn6QeNap8cpTdde5VKue3KnlPoEZFBRzrzFN8ZvJx4Y8/0B7Hnqrj/hA5ys9VzMm 9qVbBxiMQBW8CmGic3dAX2e8/pLS9xyKk4NwMvdCPslno60lpIOqsCnDLTalzyunOdR5 R+FOVpzY/OrVzIdAE3r1sE09rx+TB/SHauvv+xVTOX6eKc5eLid+gGkWP3i5rYNa8sZ3 RLUQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=o4PHRISe+vUADIFJwhtL70wqMiMYtcEjMEZ1FRwGxrg=; b=gGbB34NeyM2hCnL1SrwkGtsCkgqoBuS5SZXI0gzqoQnQTTH9xc1R1PrGxdKsV0fuYJ QWYNP6xFhATJN6JdirLF7Ol/8fwtBsxfGobTgy0ZyhqVjnRK2CmzD9KE7siGPtDKa+bB b4S1IrQk9eKidPM1oPo11G8ECO7nv21iKgi3GgUnRVe5zsVUth/utTBB7XJm6JVHUcR6 VB1wWUnMpnmgoUyvGx3Nt9FjicXVgR4K99hXnGa78VCnHPjGWAe2Vjtl2lnhWROEF5TT bpb/jxe2O6e6Qu5ncshtDJhTDvwuUXyEO/KFkJPw3kgC8uwz7d4MYug9lCvNttTP/OMM 4UJA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2019-08-05 header.b=SzDjBz+6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 10si13958532ejw.231.2019.10.15.14.22.11; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2019-08-05 header.b=SzDjBz+6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388967AbfJOSBb (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:01:31 -0400 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:46472 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725820AbfJOSBb (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:01:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9FHmctP077103; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:01:24 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=o4PHRISe+vUADIFJwhtL70wqMiMYtcEjMEZ1FRwGxrg=; b=SzDjBz+6RhmaQ7DS+C4xMjAzWZaWC22S2KOLhiRkQ2oJQjLgF4AqkJOTMqXqOa1aCmP3 CjMfG56zcCHYzh5LaaupRg8bFoUTa+vUmmXhWJ1J+pp6bIyJgtoZqi+DyXS+e2h/S6dS dIPwwJrxzXc7aDoFQ0ZfJuUfzK0cmxUsUwULj0FdviGNEv0rvbu5kc10KOQR/etH8Br3 r9sJM97Olr8Wc4JFkjPWVRNA+r532xEPoz/eO+ZXSEWmEfPk52qVFmNoYAmxppURJl7B AYycbB/DiKg+y3DRCrTKHeQ4mWsR7RiUh+UMXPEYPKzHhRJds9vxIfB+lu4X168TGvla 8Q== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2vk6sqhu7x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:01:24 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9FHmFlP048830; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:01:24 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2vnf7rnnk0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:01:23 +0000 Received: from abhmp0006.oracle.com (abhmp0006.oracle.com [141.146.116.12]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x9FI1LK4013097; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:01:21 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:01:20 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:01:19 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Damien Le Moal , Andreas Gruenbacher , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] xfs: set IOMAP_F_NEW more carefully Message-ID: <20191015180119.GQ13108@magnolia> References: <20191015154345.13052-1-hch@lst.de> <20191015154345.13052-3-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191015154345.13052-3-hch@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9411 signatures=668684 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910150153 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9411 signatures=668684 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910150153 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:43:35PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Don't set IOMAP_F_NEW if we COW over and existing allocated range, as "..over an existing..." > these aren't strictly new allocations. This is required to be able to > use IOMAP_F_NEW to zero newly allocated blocks, which is required for > the iomap code to fully support file systems that don't do delayed > allocations or use unwritten extents. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Other than that, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong --D > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c > index 54c9ec7ad337..c0a492353826 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c > @@ -707,9 +707,12 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay( > * Flag newly allocated delalloc blocks with IOMAP_F_NEW so we punch > * them out if the write happens to fail. > */ > - iomap_flags |= IOMAP_F_NEW; > - trace_xfs_iomap_alloc(ip, offset, count, whichfork, > - whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK ? &imap : &cmap); > + if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) { > + iomap_flags |= IOMAP_F_NEW; > + trace_xfs_iomap_alloc(ip, offset, count, whichfork, &imap); > + } else { > + trace_xfs_iomap_alloc(ip, offset, count, whichfork, &cmap); > + } > done: > if (whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK) { > if (imap.br_startoff > offset_fsb) { > -- > 2.20.1 >