Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp6725571ybp; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:42:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0rEL1proDmkpqpEeWI9UWRwShgiM2k3kUYI4ndrrMyfiIOk+cgbv4TPbX8GcVtd3nEH9W X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:509:: with SMTP id m9mr2338470edv.267.1571197331677; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:42:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571197331; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y4aYHjiG2UonvJt3yWGF41BN9vrTZiF/VN/PdtVxE0r5/TfyJ3bwBWNKoRVUIvNYgi AwMfCmiz0rEkk/C0hkHhFTTU4bj2LX+XLWnHiz+euuLcDZjA254eReHnfgWnAf/tta17 zd6cTCFo2UDNy40GJnfkKol+2gpqIse9h08KjNkLjaf6m8yXU03sEtuQ2rjo1j+FGeBJ TtA6Nt4yYqAKkYaoeg4UCr78hN7cdnRXbhZ0B3zt+D4bGMHhsY2UlP2CRCTpuHdp46SG LO8dDxS92WIbMOzCXmK/F+YKtz/8jfRmMMQiOKtsNKXwnXwoW6wTKk0gs91Y6qijqSmz Ai3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=dK3t9AxAtDqpmJRfjX81BITOjcQhY9SeVbBfeMuALZ4=; b=sbJzXvDIgj1HZRBCHRgpGols6TWF/FmcOl3seKHf/2IkAwF9d9/MTC1F7w70ix6GyF wEf4vJPmDwfBsmuVQxcL68XWlRFYSJmgw6ZdDD2N/OkupQPS0fq5aMAG/tPCKy8Dlu4q bhzsOLHQGAH2v6Sm9EWoTUaJ46deMHUiC1x1NztHcsZ0TMAU18VE8fSKeaHCzWPvjk64 /NfWbKd1yXu3otgs2RIkfmr3b4LsdEGd9QAtQ7wBNOPbjePzOdDF0S5vkOcTWy+5hh6Q TbSh8UoMTqz3ntzl2p6To272BseS/FGUyK0HOYJ7thXqEONUkdvqdasjW8TYQP0enCAC kxNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="mZIQzB/P"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt13si14698688edb.245.2019.10.15.20.41.48; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="mZIQzB/P"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733289AbfJOU0T (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:26:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:40204 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728692AbfJOU0T (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:26:19 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v38so19315584edm.7; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:26:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dK3t9AxAtDqpmJRfjX81BITOjcQhY9SeVbBfeMuALZ4=; b=mZIQzB/PTEGfdZOyUPws2dWuOFpjB3wfSVVLSfgTbo2xLkMfjOTvL1yjasjGVEla6W yBCv4O4PayyPJ5o7mwhHBEv96UuapbXXeP69kIm3LjobI6e5uJouQXpe36oK1Mp2ZH7Y kyH6Hk7sJKEdZ4SEyMxZw2aDEEVewW5H3RKxMeS4WkdbYJ0zCoZ4xY+/rZeIYVTyU90e Mun9bLBYyGXNWA8vr3ZKlRxX3ZJB2YNrQpoxyNFR2eCyggDQ0TZ7MJq2H8AwYE1zxbNL FBZcKEwRwq6kR0zoG9pJQ9n7FDWBd+4GOi+yNBVOhy1Krf3K6JlxFR0yeJJseNmlZOV1 3i/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dK3t9AxAtDqpmJRfjX81BITOjcQhY9SeVbBfeMuALZ4=; b=Dkv2dW3nTeW4BfetFiAhbaqJOgZ08cc+0VjS5+c0+SrdkAhhWICoxIaFjaOZV21NuW VWd27fe6sufWnlhY0/zrCeos5oaPFvXojXhWLtpxPPM9skepH8SNKcZiP28fOhY3rMDU GpPBxWOrxgSkRLT97ATrXAbkFYvvS06Qftp4vKnEoP5X170Glg574fixEIwes7p+/odx RdhXsRPphLmvIkQKEDzkUsB0RhMQU3EFVrShz5imZ2p7UswK/2YwgLRYJFAE1dM56o/z 1j+lA3OLblL9qDF5h11FkFZ+HVBkhCUokgrqBKEn/IBWHDTN2u5P91NzK/Da46PE8juR ikFg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVSGzxGtqDv+D2SmdkaEI2fuxQs75AAK+TUAkG81HVxx2Y+oCzY UCK/aZZc6Oe+y5fHn8y855Eeg5mb X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:557:: with SMTP id i23mr35269304edx.71.1571171177323; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.1] (ip51ccf9cd.speed.planet.nl. [81.204.249.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a36sm3909355edc.58.2019.10.15.13.26.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] include: dt-bindings: rockchip: remove RK_FUNC defines To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20191015191000.2890-1-jbx6244@gmail.com> <20191015191000.2890-2-jbx6244@gmail.com> <2236841.lnJlJmhppS@phil> From: Johan Jonker Message-ID: <29be43a3-516b-ce33-8a19-ffd8202d9c3a@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:26:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2236841.lnJlJmhppS@phil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, What's the plan for RK_FUNC_GPIO ? Change all to '0' or keep it? On 10/15/19 10:10 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2019, 21:10:00 CEST schrieb Johan Jonker: >> The defines RK_FUNC_1, RK_FUNC_2, RK_FUNC_3 and RK_FUNC_4 >> are no longer used, so remove them to prevent >> that someone start using them again. > > That won't work. Devicetree provides a slightly flexible promise of > backwards compatibilty. So a new kernel should still work old devicetrees. > (not exactly sure if this means dt-binaries and sources or only binaries) > > So while I think RK_FUNC_0-n should not be used anymore, we should > probably just mark them as "deprecated" in a first step. > > > Heiko