Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp7287881ybp; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmni330aZhqq2dt+R+bLIXYpAEaAdHqF9qYUAdtfAO1mYzA1tDDp7erdkcfO4F9rIVjdo/ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c259:: with SMTP id y25mr38705870edo.117.1571233174881; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571233174; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sqKeWv9arkJ4mlZiyTbpElpYj8oIw5zIp0JAyLR1Uc1fb/I1+S5BoSCgunBFan0IjC JH6EO/1z48YlrlffW/wpALAcyMklJrc0Q1tu65lETF2SzfxBz0FEPmns3eY7SoVnDnJE vUDL+Gg6o4Aosu/Mek2g8XE5jr+AHZ7DFX+hH2EXQBGBnqbBFT/E9RT8ndoB0Lru0WO7 NLy4AYT1UUMx6aSH5tWIsNf5awKmD8z6XzZgWgJrZhb9PP1IKBC40Zuly6vDVDbm3xlz bf1OAAp1Fq4JDzFKHheBhl1lPlhuY9WefDnwUaSE2Nzo7fOJjZhdtQrAcncU4jqzUX42 xNhQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=FeVHyqU36/Fiorh750Po1sOyYe0FzFsBWuClzAxUjMc=; b=Syon/Hq5p+L5SdmZJ25/TeYt/SsvXb/hgZ68GInIlJpXtRKkzYgvD6gIq6rGNQQJVI nKhTwlHt9pEzCYEkJJXc0Y/5nkwg1mcYdPrK8aJzNU4u6YAWVdcq/hiPvc7VtRlCip9f JqWfmtZzIxgtR7Qe7rm+Lwyl3R9dfWqjKPP8LYNkI2XhNJ2KTZGUe0TGROP9zL6igBga ujLR+dct0ilKQyt4CBaZwMhEtxQcqUSi+e819GjMKlE/XIVgDnNq5esF+JrgNTRamV3i OFtXYSNiw6tebDqGIOXoH1PCzc+i2ah3+9qPNcNHkEomBFXGGoFGTkrqVBosg7rGSakP QSJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q4si15561913eji.152.2019.10.16.06.39.11; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391994AbfJPJf0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:35:26 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:49420 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391829AbfJPJf0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:35:26 -0400 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iKfiF-0001cC-KN; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:35:23 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:35:23 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christophe Leroy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/34] powerpc: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION Message-ID: <20191016093523.tukmwtouugecbll4@linutronix.de> References: <20191015191821.11479-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20191015191821.11479-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <156db456-af80-1f5e-6234-2e78283569b6@c-s.fr> <87d0ext4q3.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <87d0ext4q3.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-10-16 20:33:08 [+1100], Michael Ellerman wrote: > Christophe Leroy writes: > > Le 15/10/2019 à 21:17, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit : > >> From: Thomas Gleixner > >> > >> CONFIG_PREEMPTION is selected by CONFIG_PREEMPT and by CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. > >> Both PREEMPT and PREEMPT_RT require the same functionality which today > >> depends on CONFIG_PREEMPT. > >> > >> Switch the entry code over to use CONFIG_PREEMPTION. Add PREEMPT_RT > >> output in __die(). > > > > powerpc doesn't select ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT, so this change is useless as > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT cannot be selected. > > Yeah I don't think there's any point adding the "_RT" to the __die() > output until/if we ever start supporting PREEMPT_RT. so jut the PREEMPT -> PREEMPTION bits then? > cheers Sebastian