Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp7430050ybp; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:32:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwszrZEnpI5rJvhSbFwY02C65iBqPPmJzKlGojYX6IolmlGMmUqMUllgoeqMIj4xKcenAby X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de02:: with SMTP id h2mr39893833edv.212.1571239924018; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:32:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571239924; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xQLOwy97EP+sw6vvM+f2+JwoZ2icEBNecDsG4RUE8mRnosc03yqF8N1Zq96J1P9NI/ e5Qufp6W/GFWBDVSwvjEWnzLPxNt0y2I/2I+bxPjbS48xgYW9Bdy9E5NSqU17Y/SAVsG 9VpNNNDnkettjV7PYN+pBmSJNxCJ/6hcazTejJZaAvvO+z2Ri6rwTFNkj1OPj3iTo1e4 eNbKmSk8RUpxWrcohTr1YembYvHQMUIv752mQXIyKtYRPz7O/VCY2CqePwLUCKtBGA4/ KC1raZLbCxsJykWQDd3dqm7u9SPKO759YCz8R7XlURk2EDCU3iilSX2fho+BeV5hM1ss iSYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=pD9wWL2WMgZK7YYyIRCZINyrBNOjUA1dU3gpfZGBsF8=; b=YanJC9ikTsUlj/iRLnxUG/3nflcUg9Ou+vUb5bcmiT0HsnF4TD+9mM+jz8MK3K7Nqq AFl/fLW4DWuctAlb7kx8Nja1mavYE7sz6gMXINuYynB1ArUrE17rkzb9R2VitXPm0BkF tz6jY2+AdoMZiPLWZ+O6sop+4spkTM+aOyuqV3zdmnrjUQzvw3Dc6D0MRb0umxGAw39b FbKo0Nm/sEfFirRm0OyWEKRmXTczx+LwNFHaK7/BbscvT5MPsBJeuFfcZjx7RWekqhmu KSsX1I6QFcw6uwA49dnTXnRi5NcXApwtq+WdQJx5CcPTVwtJ5djFy9kly0bsVfaRhAri qQQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.s=201909 header.b=bCMHAt5N; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u12si18774368edi.326.2019.10.16.08.31.39; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.s=201909 header.b=bCMHAt5N; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2393056AbfJPM2e (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:28:34 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:35093 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726354AbfJPM2e (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:28:34 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46tWmZ1H2hz9sPT; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:28:29 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1571228910; bh=zy552ubPLEsREybng5yyRj8M9/b2s2rupYBl2LF3oTc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bCMHAt5NbQsRJswiloLS3BOMtt5ozH95akKYDF6rl/hufXVy+LHqqh/fqsjrfF+3z Alet/wZMxFgDW8KadWsXJTA0jeN+2Zdkh9XybwAMoSY29aEywv5tdejZ9Qsrv9XOty sEuw2h4sMcPBOoPFygj1lmCyE1KhQLZMMmcCm3OnfAW+s0UfdxMkNDgQDZfo65iEBc Ayib6bC0jO1+iOBlp22lb66OFocUOhlpDv6LjB3iF+uyMZnhNPQ5a8Jt/9SyNFiYAb dG1LdmqIZVEf8EoaCY5/te9lPxv+l5L9BKm++npzrJ3CyxemLqh9zRs1MWThBC/8WT 4l2wEZN3JDAGg== From: Michael Ellerman To: Christian Brauner , Aleksa Sarai Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usercopy: Avoid soft lockups in test_check_nonzero_user() In-Reply-To: <20191011094333.7hovhhacrvlf6uq6@wittgenstein> References: <20191010114007.o3bygjf4jlfk242e@yavin.dot.cyphar.com> <20191011022447.24249-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <20191011034810.xkmz3e4l5ezxvq57@yavin.dot.cyphar.com> <20191011094333.7hovhhacrvlf6uq6@wittgenstein> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:28:20 +1100 Message-ID: <87a7a0ub6j.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Brauner writes: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:48:10PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: >> On 2019-10-11, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> > On a machine with a 64K PAGE_SIZE, the nested for loops in >> > test_check_nonzero_user() can lead to soft lockups, eg: >> > >> > watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [modprobe:611] >> > Modules linked in: test_user_copy(+) vmx_crypto gf128mul crc32c_vpmsum virtio_balloon ip_tables x_tables autofs4 >> > CPU: 4 PID: 611 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G L 5.4.0-rc1-gcc-8.2.0-00001-gf5a1a536fa14-dirty #1151 >> > ... >> > NIP __might_sleep+0x20/0xc0 >> > LR __might_fault+0x40/0x60 >> > Call Trace: >> > check_zeroed_user+0x12c/0x200 >> > test_user_copy_init+0x67c/0x1210 [test_user_copy] >> > do_one_initcall+0x60/0x340 >> > do_init_module+0x7c/0x2f0 >> > load_module+0x2d94/0x30e0 >> > __do_sys_finit_module+0xc8/0x150 >> > system_call+0x5c/0x68 >> > >> > Even with a 4K PAGE_SIZE the test takes multiple seconds. Instead >> > tweak it to only scan a 1024 byte region, but make it cross the >> > page boundary. >> > >> > Fixes: f5a1a536fa14 ("lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper") >> > Suggested-by: Aleksa Sarai >> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman >> > --- >> > lib/test_user_copy.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- >> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> > How does this look? It runs in < 1s on my machine here. >> > >> > cheers >> > >> > diff --git a/lib/test_user_copy.c b/lib/test_user_copy.c >> > index 950ee88cd6ac..9fb6bc609d4c 100644 >> > --- a/lib/test_user_copy.c >> > +++ b/lib/test_user_copy.c >> > @@ -47,9 +47,26 @@ static bool is_zeroed(void *from, size_t size) >> > static int test_check_nonzero_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, size_t size) >> > { >> > int ret = 0; >> > - size_t start, end, i; >> > - size_t zero_start = size / 4; >> > - size_t zero_end = size - zero_start; >> > + size_t start, end, i, zero_start, zero_end; >> > + >> > + if (test(size < 1024, "buffer too small")) >> > + return -EINVAL; >> > + >> > + /* >> > + * We want to cross a page boundary to exercise the code more >> > + * effectively. We assume the buffer we're passed has a page boundary at >> > + * size / 2. We also don't want to make the size we scan too large, >> > + * otherwise the test can take a long time and cause soft lockups. So >> > + * scan a 1024 byte region across the page boundary. >> > + */ >> > + start = size / 2 - 512; >> > + size = 1024; >> >> I don't think it's necessary to do "size / 2" here -- you can just use >> PAGE_SIZE directly and check above that "size == 2*PAGE_SIZE" (not that >> this check is exceptionally necessary -- since there's only one caller >> of this function and it's in the same file). > > Michael, in case you resend, can you make my life a little easier and do > it on top of > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git/log/?h=copy_struct_from_user > please. I have a fix from Aleksa sitting in there laready that _might_ > cause a conflict otherwise. No worries, done. cheers