Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp7462306ybp; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:01:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8sWfjJ/8+qdCiqtt1L3rZ8hs9XLRcNhbVqhcTbi+u68AGvXFzjpwolF2L+Y4riHMFguYy X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:470d:: with SMTP id y13mr40657653ejq.241.1571241702159; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:01:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571241702; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gq81UBiVrcXwQAafkkQ2R85yIeQdN71xVfnPsJwur473RL83PqqN8orDZ4krv+uF1V D6A4ilTPBT3/2vfXdfZRt7G2ibH2ZmYFnGPTlM61fOHcz6l7S5d85oFeFikGnwW5pXjd 5fBCOmJbUzWRwxXfXyqm13SzIlmiT4yXV8SGXqK34dv2GASZcsTrJGqXn9guUnUsXonw LnPV8gII3x4CIGpBEwATSuhl54zQ8FOMbNQsmTbGgNWS1CkORRh05dFAFQlSYOyrZMPv jatFpgovRIuyH9tpqmhdz9RkdfWSguU3nn6ZtupQDF00+ol+YDBHow8pvMsHZICH9tjw Q7zQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=f977w5do5jz69hMASq2tWL9wr7n2QIuF3YKl0AIaWgw=; b=jC1JlNK8EkPBuusJTwf3/LLpZooGo82i+PwuHvcQu3Uq3UjB8kFh0+GamuK3hJghOD AV2bw2mhXJNnoEwJD7BDgl55xIZP/QCNqdjIuSCahJNz/mS43QqrZO+MyGCEhAhMkHKu vS2FDKRgQO9k3T8TNzdlgtn8KF7VMGdOCY9vUh6Qazpc58EKznzw0I9VAek3PlzVdTuN vc1+ATrLUA0y4YncDbt0ZioBpVABlWDiT5uDcqT/xKFVrexbkY7Die3XhHPQ9JauzO7i WCUz4LgshEqMCypqhowoXb3NgbB2IempfdDqthPqka6ROATNkSJiTJkw4cwYaYNETPkO bjlg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hh9si14513175ejb.313.2019.10.16.09.01.18; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2393414AbfJPNCg (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:02:36 -0400 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:52841 "EHLO imap1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728878AbfJPNCg (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:02:36 -0400 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=[10.35.5.173]) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1iKiwi-00004r-5P; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:02:32 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bpf: add static in net/core/filter.c To: Daniel Borkmann Cc: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, Alexei Starovoitov , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20191016110446.24622-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <20191016122605.GC21367@pc-63.home> From: Ben Dooks Organization: Codethink Limited. Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:02:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191016122605.GC21367@pc-63.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16/10/2019 13:26, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:04:46PM +0100, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote: >> There are a number of structs in net/core/filter.c >> that are not exported or declared outside of the >> file. Fix the following warnings by making these >> all static: >> >> net/core/filter.c:8465:31: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? >> net/core/filter.c:8472:27: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? > [...] >> net/core/filter.c:8935:27: warning: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >> --- >> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov >> Cc: Daniel Borkmann >> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau >> Cc: Song Liu >> Cc: Yonghong Song >> Cc: "David S. Miller" >> Cc: Jakub Kicinski >> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer >> Cc: John Fastabend >> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> --- >> net/core/filter.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c >> index ed6563622ce3..f7338fee41f8 100644 >> --- a/net/core/filter.c >> +++ b/net/core/filter.c >> @@ -8462,18 +8462,18 @@ static u32 sk_msg_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, >> return insn - insn_buf; >> } >> >> -const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = { >> +static const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = { >> .get_func_proto = sk_filter_func_proto, >> .is_valid_access = sk_filter_is_valid_access, >> .convert_ctx_access = bpf_convert_ctx_access, >> .gen_ld_abs = bpf_gen_ld_abs, >> }; > > Big obvious NAK. I'm puzzled that you try to fix a compile warning, but without > even bothering to compile the result after your patch ... builds fine. maybe some effort to stop this happening again should be made. > Seen BPF_PROG_TYPE() ? -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html