Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp142661ybp; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:23:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7n6KibEscQ3gNUMg72iAnooWtzsQVLPVAI0+31w+/j1hlYTBRlNyAsFkxqbkwi1MbShd7 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d908:: with SMTP id a8mr528174edr.49.1571264610499; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:23:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571264610; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pCFWilTTIECLZ/D1sfegKyKhChWix/qEIBzqdgQyhoCa/f8owzI3nIgxM3KmEm2NWZ 1/RBKwENkPMDEEo7n1kNEK4/RxgIDtWoNqQ9k6FWbvo2V/tw8uDijDlRIQ1WP0AULUSm aQhEGrorxUzaGLBHJiZZ2Yd/8+5PEn+sHH/VuZHSwuqBfQmAxGqAoa6K7Ig7rcVT8eBv llf2Rw4Fp7eXfLPs1yhfeusvshnCa2Zj/8fj8X9OEZ3r1+X38uhQBfMkuTUeDVvF5uEM aHWDJ7CI60R10SSDwUTV3BdSdJjUYiTr24BqbYoSSO2EMMWw54nue2wOHlfuqBZn76tj xDeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=pKa7m7C9OjqLEW5dUEbf1fkVNpXDmrugnLQ1yWW+TFw=; b=QxkQJoZ9K554J3IVGe90iKHbBjcoN2LghxPjU/ISbsTLpVLzjdy1xoCK9zZt5Kgxs+ p/6HwNtMZAYL0SFaTL4Um9fQoHRyvbZ7odUPrf11PU2qWaRFN+LXy+3cn2JNe1u16B/p cBiQmYrTk66kNkqJ1LRpx4YwbNkwq2Bx0Htn1CoDUqBrmUVkKgYBxhmBVdGXUthCs6ox tREMpn+9Yl+lUGLim5qLBgkLRnIvtZLYPYkTHUUhEvLaGFqtxa/h//yECDSNmSrDuxlp lcuxi5W5/Yl+pOFJ6yJb1X2Z50fZOWry4Ha7Y+Xuymns21lcDXDyQ3ZM6AfgDY87ooz7 8xWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d29si237498edb.203.2019.10.16.15.23.07; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388821AbfJPQDS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:03:18 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56948 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727881AbfJPQDS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:03:18 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852C0B412; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:03:14 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Qian Cai Cc: Tom Murphy , Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: "Convert the AMD iommu driver to the dma-iommu api" is buggy Message-ID: <20191016160314.GH4695@suse.de> References: <1571237707.5937.58.camel@lca.pw> <1571237982.5937.60.camel@lca.pw> <20191016153112.GF4695@suse.de> <1571241213.5937.64.camel@lca.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1571241213.5937.64.camel@lca.pw> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 17:31 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > The x86 one might just be a mistake. > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c > index ad05484d0c80..63c4b894751d 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c > @@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ static int amd_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *dom, > unsigned long iova, > ????????if (iommu_prot & IOMMU_WRITE) > ????????????????prot |= IOMMU_PROT_IW; > ? > -???????ret = iommu_map_page(domain, iova, paddr, page_size, prot, GFP_KERNEL); > +???????ret = iommu_map_page(domain, iova, paddr, page_size, prot, gfp); Yeah, that is a bug, I spotted that too. > @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ static struct iommu_dma_msi_page > *iommu_dma_get_msi_page(struct device *dev, > ????????if (!iova) > ????????????????goto out_free_page; > ? > -???????if (iommu_map(domain, iova, msi_addr, size, prot)) > +???????if (iommu_map_atomic(domain, iova, msi_addr, size, prot)) > ????????????????goto out_free_iova; Not so sure this is a bug, this code is only about setting up MSIs on ARM. It probably doesn't need to be atomic. Regards, Joerg