Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp933116ybp; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:49:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwI1yiFV57CrP5puVKn1BXYsdMksi0eQK1ykp/EYGJUfs2b14Q+8SPwY4u3MXEPl9nH/YVF X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c6d5:: with SMTP id b21mr3584781eds.37.1571316574972; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:49:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571316574; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=knV6H1mtG2HtpfhRWCx1vKQSyGC/S6Cbr/Ax94rGswQzzcS65ddrrBChVM97s9C1T1 Jr14YilUh6OKjJIKG8sNY1+DkKk/jA1YEu1PNqUzz+VOtrHKaz2fB+ZdoOKegzXIuPFS 9eQ9zXpSa6PJml9gcjFvSbP8f0bNdtVz0bVQSODJ5PycEcmW44NDVg0xRduHT3dxgfdk +j81mDo4myVQ60bZ2fcTGZzh7u9u2hDG84oNE+0s2xDvjEwCsWYD+vISpx4PM271+i8p EVLU5zVxbpBpoR3h95DZcgnoedsKIonXe/hElZec2T6vkRYmTAA7kyobOXv0jxCXQ0pY B1Vg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=S41T/SvGPTMLz7d30EqKYik4B5TC1OKO48rKt7eW5yg=; b=KcgfvaPbp41wkRhjNUQZ9Nmx/7yv0yUrSFJMHUwJL80ZZey58ovpXUcNOb+PF4XCNo MeTcunOc38NW5K74uft5HkmdfYFppJpmi5ztVG4yiRLpSzke71wMFclj0rmfq2cyI0XN 3+jzIRIBMHfKCJE/y6AcvF9WmtXkc0xPu2wtVOU3OrAzJRPED+fk16K0M86EnaRqLjin Eu6AvB8gsAni+jfO3X92yOkO53sf2lftIDmLfH4YMB4ZLriCNy0CES3ckU7xWQkCNfpN iBvFguzSzzKY0yYcbRUVKqXSXMGsdOdgrDWTK/CV7qBSAqZ/25hvrQfrVtZqUsBUSMAv cL9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r9si1324930eju.10.2019.10.17.05.49.12; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394088AbfJPRoN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:44:13 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:52198 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389705AbfJPRoN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:44:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2603:3023:50c:85e1:5314:1b70:2a53:887e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5853A142387B6; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:44:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20191016.134411.315258296003464370.davem@davemloft.net> To: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, ast@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bpf: add static in net/core/filter.c From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20191016131020.GE21367@pc-63.home> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Dooks Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:11:52 +0100 > Hmm, your config it does, I get /none/ of these warnings. > > I guess a lot of this is being built whether or not is then used. When you are making changes like this, unless you have done a full grep over the tree and are %100 sure it is unrefrenced you should do at a minimum an allmodconfig build. Otherwise by definition you are not testing the build of this change.