Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp926652ybg; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:22:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyYKp89dmPrryptZ0QwrWO4sdmDtTtgpWxTL/3XgeF77VEhgJ9M7KYoH1DQ13w7Rfp3bKR4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6ad7:: with SMTP id q23mr9198774ejs.214.1571415724101; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:22:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571415724; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=enZWvvi144UB1oSh/rOlJlFNnxbP0DZvoVuKIdj6DOuJxVnjboiv6Y82UBiiHQd6tc j5jpKYe7qiVDkIgAPi/FCwvW3fUKFTzBeHYCv36y4xjrV/DdieDGTeLI5GgIBlaJYKfC 03qYRKiAcoKZEXTNUTQAVVPmJG+7DabTDIa0alYzUpWsMClprMxZSqt2sOdO/hgoRmBD AVaF61zCCs5+CR46+VmvStPRfIY8VR5DX+juJmynxYTk81gVWDc9GPrnn17d+2MzLO7h iaNa/wEJ4ES/R69grlzDAh5LCtZdEdLD7ykXJX5VXjwtEogRCNajTRQJIJYLbj3R+IKH g09Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=rFHRZluJEkfBjCB/4Cylo0T67ioObwZsxcFDTsyjDjQ=; b=HYAc2MP8A4hgUNiFubRJ+PdQFDnVIDfms99K2SjheDl17uDg70yxo19aRG0PelHLfp Zu6hMNB1jaUJalZsf4BnbD1mVKm/Yg8XYUmJZ9J6BucvzQ5aXaE/dJwc2pa0ZanVmPP3 i1OAWpCp/c3F9xVN4K06KSiFchOKlVLcRsaumuUqATOzY8f2zlK/CYQOVUdFloMmKKEC hkmVq0i1LEZ85eazYA7v0Nf0qVCO3OwKv0NDyhB6WIwOEDvHZL77hzjy9T5XPC4JiJ7D E+gXkd+ZTC17mYtva0p7egOULRWdY5rE/YejSKrrwtCe7StD7pPNkhqz7xzHTFZCoTd9 vfaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p18si4134147ejn.370.2019.10.18.09.21.40; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2440082AbfJQOUl (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:20:41 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:4216 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2440048AbfJQOUk (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:20:40 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5444352314939BFFAD81; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 22:20:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.251.225) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 22:20:23 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: psci: Reduce waiting time of cpu_psci_cpu_kill() To: David Laight , Sudeep Holla CC: "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "kstewart@linuxfoundation.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "wuyun.wu@huawei.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "hushiyuan@huawei.com" , "linfeilong@huawei.com" References: <18068756-0f39-6388-3290-cf03746e767d@huawei.com> <9df267db-e647-a81d-16bb-b8bfb06c2624@huawei.com> <20191016153221.GA8978@bogus> <0f550044-9ed2-5f72-1335-73417678ba45@huawei.com> From: Yunfeng Ye Message-ID: <1cd555f0-4074-36b7-8426-6f01130051d2@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 22:19:54 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.251.225] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/10/17 22:00, David Laight wrote: > From: Yunfeng Ye >> Sent: 17 October 2019 14:26 > ... >>>> - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { >>>> + i = 0; >>>> + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100); >>>> + do { >>>> err = psci_ops.affinity_info(cpu_logical_map(cpu), 0); >>>> if (err == PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_OFF) { >>>> pr_info("CPU%d killed.\n", cpu); >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - msleep(10); >>>> - pr_info("Retrying again to check for CPU kill\n"); >>> >>> You dropped this message, any particular reason ? >>> >> When reduce the time interval to 1ms, the print message maybe increase 10 times. >> on the other hand, cpu_psci_cpu_kill() will print message on success or failure, which >> this retry log is not very necessary. of cource, I think use pr_info_once() instead of >> pr_info() is better. > > Maybe you should print in on (say) the 10th time around the loop. > Can it like this: pr_info("CPU%d killed with %d loops.\n", cpu, loops); If put the number of waiting times in the successful printing message, it is not necessary to print the "Retrying ..." message. thanks. > David > > - > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) >