Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp1718140ybg; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 01:01:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3qZdPP3y/2yG0dOZZL0Ki5PFhqVZcNox4s+w9nqI5WG3EA4gACrMNMDq0hrqkseLfJrbE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6847:: with SMTP id a7mr12514741ejs.261.1571472078379; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 01:01:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571472078; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gtf1lWZvoIStjXmX6cahlfYdRO4p2v8+K8s63vVnFC/tRtBzqg4ibOSFt5CgRnHjTb 0trKVpLvvveXyS5lqpC6LGwtgzDED8S/kuulq04nn9SQ4D+f+fn5AR3jgSlnYY1UJ8Z8 sUgVEtQ5D/xH7e2E8yvTAt/ktSOAlCaciYwwVclY1IdlVlI4BA1oMv0HZCyTFShBRXFf qKkBeFZW/gs9wLrdDZtK2CumJ6ExLp5MXGc+EtFgdeuwgenUibnB8AWuVpGLLVi5AGdx 1YlaFM599tIvR6tBVrHfFJRo8MMFRxRc8uEkJutDK+jBCnIldB6ZmGoIkAH2l3PwMWpq ol6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=4X3IhMXx94PdL1txAkY6N3waxbWnf4c5oxB+ZY+jeic=; b=AH/kORXgwj7LFW4aquo/KCMPSY/mMczIbiWGvMTsGOR0zv3nY5TV9mvB1I+xYMSV3O 6Zf+lhRDPQbXE2DoilMKSLzQlWiamTzawo+7AClhtUfsCPBVfeyyybc8D/jy+ufDcPKC 7VPgCFkTcDlsUgjzwr6L2vS46cP/DUau1Ic/KXjtNI5vdx6SGUbuJb1ZPH9N0FzFGJt8 zMPsmhKSMw8ZyeChjiuZzHfm2QzfxVUmhgxXhcDEyyxYby+gPXdf/6sXvfErNqeKnYKY qDakVaNFjaTlmLjWqbNBKt2ftDB8FuoEtgppTVp+/Erwxtr8NONb4BfehJltp5eERZ14 w3iQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rl13si5131668ejb.228.2019.10.19.01.00.55; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 01:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406976AbfJRIiY (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 04:38:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52764 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405150AbfJRIiX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 04:38:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1C20306A21B; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.118.57] (unknown [10.36.118.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526C15D713; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: memory offline infinite loop after soft offline To: Michal Hocko Cc: Naoya Horiguchi , Qian Cai , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Mike Kravetz References: <1570829564.5937.36.camel@lca.pw> <20191014083914.GA317@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191017093410.GA19973@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20191017100106.GF24485@dhcp22.suse.cz> <1571335633.5937.69.camel@lca.pw> <20191017182759.GN24485@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191018021906.GA24978@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <33946728-bdeb-494a-5db8-e279acebca47@redhat.com> <20191018082459.GE5017@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:38:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191018082459.GE5017@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18.10.19 10:24, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 18-10-19 10:13:36, David Hildenbrand wrote: > [...] >> However, if the compound page spans multiple pageblocks > > Although hugetlb pages spanning pageblocks are possible this shouldn't > matter in__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock because this function doesn't > really operate on pageblocks as the name suggests. It is simply > traversing all valid RAM ranges (see walk_system_ram_range). As long as the hugepages don't span memory blocks/sections, you are right. I have no experience with gigantic pages in this regard. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb