DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ERyRZS99ZL837YBz3IxuKMU2i5PRIzWq2LbUq6/XGXfOqveneJ8/RnH34SOZETQTwbl883r2w5G/KJNjdv/TmQFB8izgFoGRNiPJ700jq1t6lAJctvVYUIcb2l71NIM+4yP8M5ZM8JfDvVHa7qCBN68b7UGZQMwGpEuN9+GJV3s=
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:26:25 +0100
From: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] scsi_transport_spi.c: make print_nego() static
Message-Id: <20060107022625.e2c1dc0f.diegocg@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060105223918.GM12313@stusta.de>
References: <20060105223918.GM12313@stusta.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 797
Lines: 19

El Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:39:18 +0100,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> escribi?:

> This patch makes a needlessly global function static.


Ok, so this is probably a stupid question and it may have been already
discussed but.....

Isn't possible that GCC would/will add an extension (a useful one) similar
to the visibility thing that c++ got in GCC 4.x? It somewhat weird
that we need to mark things static, instead of the contrary (marking
as global the things you want to make global, would be much nicer since
the functions made global would be the "API")
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/