Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932672AbWAGG3Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 01:29:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932679AbWAGG3Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 01:29:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:52908 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932672AbWAGG3P (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 01:29:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:28:51 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] Unlinline a bunch of other functions Message-Id: <20060106222851.713e0289.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1136544226.2940.23.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <1136543825.2940.8.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1136544226.2940.23.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 542 Lines: 12 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Remove the "inline" keyword from a bunch of big functions in the kernel > with the goal of shrinking it by 30kb to 40kb Was this done very carefully? I look at e100_start_receiver() and cannot see a reason for uninlining it. Are there others? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/