Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp1779833ybg; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:20:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5BqSlb0wStgxz9gPojrTt3mL870hQ0ZtKPbfR9xzlH9WEF+sdKOMwN8hYf0PWkcI3GLza X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1505:: with SMTP id b5mr12862530ejd.195.1571476838537; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:20:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571476838; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JsMBky55u+WJeSxg4Rayv7H9VQiNjlBXRrwAVevKwBrzJgO/pLdmhfAHTWW/QuZ/nM XWji+jWEmekZQV6+ZtCx8No/5d/O3W33E/gFz/8NCLvtoes9zF25mhEaG10PCmmGrxKJ 6U8XiYyoZZyUhaw21MNCTmj5efTM/8V+LB9PN70m6S+kz9QdSCutRy3JtxUtk1oxuSZi RJ+BOpAo1cvIrLVV3IuWJCj55C1vONYiRhxw1tKtJu9RR6o0rb2Q7kpOmHbY9bp08r8b Yx2AgOOzeCO5JKUi0mZhrO+65/PAP6UMQDv1ZUTkuTbCq+TbgjN+WoDzqx/c0qYWytnF ikKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=x/NuivOaNcoVxSGecvK1Wkc/UqqJxGqtaVPaOthR2x8=; b=D+Kwn5OfNOssnQIdieyJ4nESKgilwIGvzlfWzZqu+u2JicrnSFKbjRj0L+GgToULI9 tY/UECf9wmd4qETmje2+BzzPnnmdRkpx2W9DcllQySPavGNZbDfAwGjlzJwu6iXjGIc3 SCbgr7LgY/zKO5/5MqUzuxbhYU7o4PHFG91yWypDadPMghb9aCanbGuncUnKxbok+rry KobU7ph7lJ7su8y+y6iQTv5EYMjO3tpjDkGFkTDeCi4ALtx/+jXysvyWw+MrCzWN6SOW 76qQWu15rqUAz3oL7Z0+z1V+rjVXspOQbBhB3WMzW93dqyqHHU65DubuMRzH/Ukh1bIv T4Rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PVLMysH0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b30si5549057eda.200.2019.10.19.02.20.15; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PVLMysH0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2440480AbfJRVyY (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:54:24 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:38802 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394243AbfJRVyX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:54:23 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id j31so11262857qta.5 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:54:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=x/NuivOaNcoVxSGecvK1Wkc/UqqJxGqtaVPaOthR2x8=; b=PVLMysH0ZgoHbB8ys0h71PvCjq6BoXMmpyc7E3kYu6dUDS/qfK95htRVtkaJH9jH0F mSX0SISUKRjEVV6wtc/sQLngzyFkyrX26j0lRtGMQezlu/+2uIxqazah6sz53SNS0XKM Ri4HGtynzc9X8OPa5RDRpAt7ar9r1cb4KcgKSI9CxjltPdi1F/qLUrK6VxCcfhh+zOy/ ZExxxaE5zQghDP9lkihlIPfYql4LOVSA6z8EiO7orY+2w1MYsZ80OQVikwhIMM9l3FDH 4dL4E0Sor3fijW8SH2FZpsxzyFAdw/RgqdOAgccnl2ZA3xUoQFpjx7AbCiFRCOy28Q8K 4IkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x/NuivOaNcoVxSGecvK1Wkc/UqqJxGqtaVPaOthR2x8=; b=d+qOcwFf/0RfY7vLbd8UYh/hr8zY1O5c+w/jD75JsRhPtlYt77kO3SUtzgPMyoR4Sa zGKbMcKkxtc5Xui23/xA7S8a2nZCXxho26llizGtYWgJHy8HjtcL32QUXpqUO/Nf8BYF 26ivTuxJEDIrZ3yDmRLTVzNgs+5KTJrX+pHQzDL63OJaPJj1XgHBpjbNr8mzm9kggGiN flGgSSYKSdtkROxYh/4arwpJI8g8kHF14VoiHu+JUUhjsYrHihvbxqdLRHsCh4RSuQOa THzC4TT4u3397aGaodnyHbggGgwFBF2zgUt+lhh83lBRuDB6vTDipRfqnlLNq7YB+sBU axRA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW5zJsxpQX5t/natb8T4gP/hzRgPAuyD9jcfYgwCUKLk6xZxaHA jZuG9h6/CLfh36keS5d2SUej6FuZalfEUloJyAU= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2a5d:: with SMTP id l29mr12091370qtl.314.1571435662831; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:54:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191017164223.2762148-1-songliubraving@fb.com> <20191017164223.2762148-5-songliubraving@fb.com> <20191018133231.vifgnueulyo57vpy@box> In-Reply-To: <20191018133231.vifgnueulyo57vpy@box> From: Yang Shi Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:54:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/thp: allow drop THP from page cache To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Song Liu , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux MM , Andrew Morton , matthew.wilcox@oracle.com, kernel-team@fb.com, william.kucharski@oracle.com, "Kirill A. Shutemov" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:32 AM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 02:46:38PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:42 AM Song Liu wrote: > > > > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" > > > > > > Once a THP is added to the page cache, it cannot be dropped via > > > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches. Fix this issue with proper handling in > > > invalidate_mapping_pages(). > > > > > > Fixes: 99cb0dbd47a1 ("mm,thp: add read-only THP support for (non-shmem) FS") > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > > > Tested-by: Song Liu > > > Signed-off-by: Song Liu > > > --- > > > mm/truncate.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c > > > index 8563339041f6..dd9ebc1da356 100644 > > > --- a/mm/truncate.c > > > +++ b/mm/truncate.c > > > @@ -592,6 +592,16 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping, > > > unlock_page(page); > > > continue; > > > } > > > + > > > + /* Take a pin outside pagevec */ > > > + get_page(page); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Drop extra pins before trying to invalidate > > > + * the huge page. > > > + */ > > > + pagevec_remove_exceptionals(&pvec); > > > + pagevec_release(&pvec); > > > > Shall we skip the outer pagevec_remove_exceptions() if it has been done here? > > It will be NOP and skipping would complicate the code. Yes, it would be. Anyway, it looks ok too. Acked-by: Yang Shi > > -- > Kirill A. Shutemov