Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:10:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:10:33 -0400 Received: from nsd.netnomics.com ([216.71.84.35]:18757 "EHLO mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:10:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 18:10:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Jeff Garzik To: Christian Ullrich cc: Alexander Viro , Linus Torvalds , Vincent Sweeney , arvest@orphansonfire.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Partitioning problems in 2.4.11 In-Reply-To: <20011012010310.A1255@christian.chrullrich.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Christian Ullrich wrote: [...] > zone(0): 4096 pages. > zone(1): 225280 pages. > zone(2): 32748 pages. [...] > Memory: 1029868k/1048496k available (678k kernel code, 18240k reserved, 164k data, 168k init, 130992k highmem) > Dentry-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) > Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) > Mount-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) > Buffer-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) > Page-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) To tangent, do we really need a mount cache that big, even on a highmem machine? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/