Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4056458ybg; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:06:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXoIU1Ltr2H2USULNWiciBk4KaaLhBP9cdiVEJI7aJ3AvXx+DTDsrXCvUp40GhC2Y+vZb7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5ac3:: with SMTP id x3mr9275976ejs.145.1571652390654; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:06:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571652390; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SHgmQ13msS6n8hKB1bgFbZdYkuJaIDPAavHlUmcwLP8FnnPBtfCdBQaX8/lz4Mf1GU D6YZmQWWuo9nr5UYa35LzSxiFo37JJT0ElTFB9SuGEtLz1dR78K/m/hKtZEczON+aICP na6RIbVTW1p7Pw0Qx5i1QnOJ70kiaYwlnSbmWtghbFvQPzTFTfOix+456OuAzUZQHDwA W5nBeofD9K/wtm9dsCVj3p4kAbGpBZ0nfYofERJjuXtpBX+cVpMs8JXlDEwNc2M0QwST SYmRVu0bpomgzOccyZs79W/7G3/tIQcg2pfSFJJkMgDuuqH6mlBGwl2uAYBTha6bNjRB xnVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=tvuL7LZ6CIF95G1MC7EvBE78DRmn4+5gOJyLizORQIc=; b=cZLM1k3ILfugg2vn+RWX5kl99Zq5Kop9692CcsOE4W0cr93zwtjz7HElD8plZv6t/X KgGaSrRfPERLtuuNx16CBr2dnIQuDhnXS335aQ10S0CfBLltl4FNFcmrSB0fSQjwQoiU 2TRrs6YWWbdwfi5SkkHg4amxgngKkDsWIIKH+RK+1qD1G7PP8a+58joSPKn1mNDiD9B/ QVyl5G9+TxIAlgV6ujmyjX2aXRu1yD9jkYNy6ehphDv1qx7+CmUF35TgL9nW9NzRlJAd MG69QpfJce+XRqmVYOhZonBkGVT1d9x0P11JLrGC4voLFh7GSn9YXgPVgBny1I9nuob0 7zOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z7si8383226ejr.99.2019.10.21.03.06.07; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727874AbfJUKFs (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:05:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56778 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727323AbfJUKFr (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:05:47 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EA3B17C; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:05:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Daniel Wagner To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Wagner , James Smart , Alex Iannicelli Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Honor module parameter lpfc_use_adisc Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:05:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20191021100542.24136-1-dwagner@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The initial lpfc_desc_set_adisc implementation dea3101e0a5c ("lpfc: add Emulex FC driver version 8.0.28") enabled ADISC if cfg_use_adisc && RSCN_MODE && FCP_2_DEVICE In commit 92d7f7b0cde3 ("[SCSI] lpfc: NPIV: add NPIV support on top of SLI-3") this changed to (cfg_use_adisc && RSC_MODE) || FCP_2_DEVICE and later in ffc954936b13 ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.13: FC Discovery Fixes and enhancements.") to (cfg_use_adisc && RSC_MODE) || (FCP_2_DEVICe && FCP_TARGET) A customer reports that after a Devlos, an ADISC failure is logged. It turns out the ADISC flag is set even the user explicitly set lpfc_use_adisc = 0. [Sat Dec 22 22:55:58 2018] lpfc 0000:82:00.0: 2:(0):0203 Devloss timeout on WWPN 50:01:43:80:12:8e:40:20 NPort x05df00 Data: x82000000 x8 xa [Sat Dec 22 23:08:20 2018] lpfc 0000:82:00.0: 2:(0):2755 ADISC failure DID:05DF00 Status:x9/x70000 Fixes: 92d7f7b0cde3 ("[SCSI] lpfc: NPIV: add NPIV support on top of SLI-3") Cc: James Smart Cc: Alex Iannicelli Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner --- Hi, Unfortunatly, I don't really know all the procotols involved. So this is just a rough guess what is wrong. Thanks, Daniel drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c index cc6b1b0bae83..d27ae84326df 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c @@ -940,9 +940,9 @@ lpfc_disc_set_adisc(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp) if (!(vport->fc_flag & FC_PT2PT)) { /* Check config parameter use-adisc or FCP-2 */ - if ((vport->cfg_use_adisc && (vport->fc_flag & FC_RSCN_MODE)) || + if (vport->cfg_use_adisc && ((vport->fc_flag & FC_RSCN_MODE) || ((ndlp->nlp_fcp_info & NLP_FCP_2_DEVICE) && - (ndlp->nlp_type & NLP_FCP_TARGET))) { + (ndlp->nlp_type & NLP_FCP_TARGET)))) { spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock); ndlp->nlp_flag |= NLP_NPR_ADISC; spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock); -- 2.16.4