Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4131680ybg; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:22:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz7l6Z8YgCH+vLPoNgVDhnCtSZiEkWzu7EWFdEA+nn4ejCs4NzPSVtNnVAq7UY5hByKje+f X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d717:: with SMTP id t23mr23940723edq.300.1571656966781; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:22:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571656966; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D/ieItiZBSVba1rLC1I0Mc5VKtkJO7DktpxbKE0wM/RIJozH0hnaldIPLAQxTWC7PG jGP2ZNbhEdQXoz1dZ4wv1SeJBEJ30YCpPMgZy2T4d6zc5Yd002TKdlRNEnX7iz+STrXf XbcBIzKSNGbBVgxh2yG1DLF+z7pltU/4RPxhiME2Tixn+D7hkUSU4rSy6vqXUYEy0FjL xL0SHEj8LWTSrtOVAOS/j9eZA7tXchkZDLag9GCw0EHeChOhfTfPYjiyuZLkJZnQ1AmS ZPtMMIQEw+mh7ieN5dS8gePNLItnKYTCedjwbKprf0Z0qqsI6BI/mfsGU2NRxEU4yd7p 2UlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Utv5f3bMZQFxc09dSYcwyu1QCKZDk8F6lvBBUvbCjhE=; b=Z9qwl173MrAaR+WUNhLbviLdlKh4/Berff3fK+OuT2kOdbunBRh/gtMOzlUbefSCyX gJQPL3D4WzvcSJX9AWPY06cUdJ7I248U9r6yCjk55Vvcw0G5esg49DPCZfZ3k6keL1o9 NhJ7im8BfMuzQ879I4fDzJQG6dmZ8X36BJhh0DGjNVP0FCqfOhRNutLyxC+Nol0qUKAQ Dgou59abkxdUEVDlw+1qvNJMNhWMQbdau5TeN8ndn7m+o1CxQsa3E23tQyEmu/iM95T8 o6O9ffE0v95XO4jlT8mZPHu4xCE15MUDEB0hfGnoyprmXLAEa8q9/xRVSDWM7TuTka4D vVeg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e5si9630969ede.150.2019.10.21.04.22.22; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727889AbfJULVx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:21:53 -0400 Received: from [217.140.110.172] ([217.140.110.172]:49738 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726767AbfJULVx (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:21:53 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77069EBD; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F10E3F718; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:21:14 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Yunfeng Ye Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , hushiyuan@huawei.com, wuyun.wu@huawei.com, linfeilong@huawei.com, Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: psci: Reduce the waiting time for cpu_psci_cpu_kill() Message-ID: <20191021112114.GC21581@bogus> References: <710429cc-4d88-b7c3-b068-5459cf8133b5@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <710429cc-4d88-b7c3-b068-5459cf8133b5@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 06:52:16PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote: > In cases like suspend-to-disk and suspend-to-ram, a large number of CPU > cores need to be shut down. At present, the CPU hotplug operation is > serialised, and the CPU cores can only be shut down one by one. In this > process, if PSCI affinity_info() does not return LEVEL_OFF quickly, > cpu_psci_cpu_kill() needs to wait for 10ms. If hundreds of CPU cores > need to be shut down, it will take a long time. > > Normally, there is no need to wait 10ms in cpu_psci_cpu_kill(). So > change the wait interval from 10 ms to max 1 ms and use usleep_range() > instead of msleep() for more accurate timer. > > In addition, reducing the time interval will increase the messages > output, so remove the "Retry ..." message, instead, track time and > output to the the successful message. Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep