Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:29:24 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        baohua@kernel.org, stephan@gerhold.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own
 dedicated MFD cell entries
Message-ID: <20191021122924.qmaio5oe5j66tfdj@holly.lan>
References: <20191021105822.20271-1-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <20191021105822.20271-5-lee.jones@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191021105822.20271-5-lee.jones@linaro.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:58:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> CS5535 is the only user of mfd_clone_cell().  It makes more sense to
> register child devices in the traditional way and remove the quite
> bespoke mfd_clone_cell() call from the MFD API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> index 053e33447808..96a99ac13384 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> @@ -57,9 +57,17 @@ static struct mfd_cell cs5535_mfd_cells[] = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -static const char *olpc_acpi_clones[] = {
> -	"olpc-xo1-pm-acpi",
> -	"olpc-xo1-sci-acpi"
> +static struct mfd_cell cs5535_olpc_mfd_cells[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "olpc-xo1-pm-acpi",
> +		.num_resources = 1,
> +		.resources = &cs5535_mfd_resources[ACPI_BAR],
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "olpc-xo1-sci-acpi",
> +		.num_resources = 1,
> +		.resources = &cs5535_mfd_resources[ACPI_BAR],
> +	},

Is the cs5535-acpi cell actually used by anything? I think it was only
ever used as a template and can be removed; I didn't spot any driver that
uses it.

PS If the cell were removed then my review comment on the previous patch
   becomes moot ;-)


>  };
>  
>  static int cs5535_mfd_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> @@ -105,10 +113,14 @@ static int cs5535_mfd_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  			goto err_remove_devices;
>  		}
>  
> -		err = mfd_clone_cell("cs5535-acpi", olpc_acpi_clones,
> -				     ARRAY_SIZE(olpc_acpi_clones));
> +		err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +				      cs5535_olpc_mfd_cells,
> +				      ARRAY_SIZE(cs5535_olpc_mfd_cells),
> +				      NULL, 0, NULL);
>  		if (err) {
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to clone MFD cell\n");
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +				"Failed to add CS5532 OLPC sub-devices: %d\n",
> +				err);
>  			goto err_release_acpi;
>  		}
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>